Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Who didn't see that coming? Wonder how this applies to retirees or those eligible for VA services. This is an extraordinarily expensive decision. Additionally, how will the need to continual hormones impact deployability - you know, the reason for having service members.
I am sure things like this will get put on the priority list, all the while people with hip, knee, and back issues are kept at the back of the line.
if they're willing to put their lives on the line for US safety and can carry the bloodied bodies of their peers off the battlefield, why shouldn't they be allowed to join?
Do the benefits this provide outweigh whatever negatives there might be? Does this ultimately improve the effectiveness of the US military and help make the US more secure?
Who didn't see that coming? Wonder how this applies to retirees or those eligible for VA services. This is an extraordinarily expensive decision. Additionally, how will the need to use continual hormones impact deployability - you know, the reason for having service members. Currently insulin dependent service members are non-deployable and the services will not enlist potenial new service with diabetes for that reason.
Good point on the VA question too, we have a transgendered veteran (male to female not sure where they are in the surgical process though) at my local VA.
Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.