Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Democrats represent a majority of the richest congressional districts"
"In 2014, the median income of households in Democratic districts was higher than in Republican districts, $53,358 to $51,834. Democrats represent seven of the 10 most affluent districts, measured by household income (four in California, two in Virginia and one in New York). Democrats also represent a majority of the 100 most affluent districts, 54-46."
So we're assuming that every person in a household in a Democratic district 1) votes and 2) votes for democrats?
I wonder who is getting the federal subsidies for the absurd Gasohol program? That corn is not grown in Democratic strongholds. Same probably applies to sugar beets and a host of other crops we do not need.
Name the states that take in the most "welfare"? What is defined as "welfare"? I cannot read the article.
It's the same old tired article/data that liberals have been trolling with for years. They always consider gov. spending on things like military bases and NASA as welfare.
Democrats more likely to be wealthy than Republicans. No wonder.. hatred, bigotry, antisocial and sociopathic thoughts do actually make it harder to hold down a job.
Most highschool dropouts are democrats. No wonder they swallow every lie liberals toss out. Most working class people are conservatives, it's no wonder the dropouts and elitist snobs don't recognize that.
"Democrats represent a majority of the richest congressional districts"
"In 2014, the median income of households in Democratic districts was higher than in Republican districts, $53,358 to $51,834. Democrats represent seven of the 10 most affluent districts, measured by household income (four in California, two in Virginia and one in New York). Democrats also represent a majority of the 100 most affluent districts, 54-46."
That doesn't mean that Democrats are more likely to be wealthy. Affluent districts tend to be in or near large cities... the same places that the Collectivist Democrat Borg like to congregate. It fails to account for the millions of poor Democrats everywhere else.
Can it be stretched to say that Republicans are more likely to be on welfare than Democrats? Then why do they hate on welfare so much?
Makes me think of video games when the worst player on the team is most likely to talk crap to his teammates about their performance.
If ignorance is bliss you must be full of joy and happiness. I suggest you learn the facts before posting things you know nothing about. A little research might help.
It's about time for the __&favoriteparty ____ has a higher IQ than the ____&other party___ post.
Aren't statistics marvelous?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
