Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:00 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,543,209 times
Reputation: 6392

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
8% interest rates would lead to an explosion in the national debt and a worst recession than the last one. I have aligned my interests with Wall Street's. That is what everyone should do.
That advice works until it doesn't. See Great Depression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:18 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,886,908 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
That advice works until it doesn't. See Great Depression.
Thanks for making my point by having to go back 80 years to find the one anomaly.

Last edited by whogo; 08-05-2016 at 05:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:37 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,543,209 times
Reputation: 6392
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Thanks for making my point by having to go back 80 years to find the one anomaly.
2008-9?. Recovery via printed money to make a black president appear competent. Consequences to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:40 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,886,908 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
2008-9?. Recovery via printed money to make a black president appear competent. Consequences to come.

I've been reading about all these consequences to come for the last 40 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:42 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Thanks for making my point by having to go back 80 years to find the one anomaly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
2008-9?. Recovery via printed money to make a black president appear competent. Consequences to come.
Holy cow........The crash had NOTHING to do with Obama. Everything that created the crash was the result of the previous 20 years. I actually condemn Obama for his actions to re-inflate the markets but not for the crash. Obama is a failure because he did the exact opposite of what he promised but Bush and Clinton are responsible for the crash.

But yet, the crash is an example which I am not sure why it wasn't mentioned to begin with. One can say they are better off now BUT only because of the actions of the Fed/Gov that has done a lot of harm to the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:46 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
I've been reading about all these consequences to come for the last 40 years.
They are happening now. From the murders of police officers, to Trump, to the continued loss of jobs, 20 trillion debt, the wars, growing food stamp roles, to much bigger actions to come, ie: China's and others current actions to undermine the dollar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 06:01 AM
 
59,041 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14281
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Would people actually start saving money, instead of going into massive debt?
Would it stagnate the economy?
Open one and find out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 06:08 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Saving money is a lifestyle choice that can be done whatever interest rates are at.

Unfortunately, living within your means is a skill few master.
The US saving rate has been historically dismal compared to most of the developed world, despite those countries having higher income taxes:

70's- 9.6%

80's- 8.6%

90's- 5.5%

00's- 5.5%

Current:5.3%

In contrast, the savings rate in Japan at peak was nearly 50%.

In contrast, the US people have higher consumer debt, live in larger spaces, eat more calories and possess more stuff than than the people in the rest of the developed world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 06:15 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Open one and find out.
B.B. just started the conversation but it's more complicated that what he noted.......would at least some be able to save if we raised rates?

For decades workers set up a retirement that depended on interest income. When that income became zero they went back to work. They took the jobs that others would have landed.

One can argue that they can invest in the markets, which is of course what the government and the markets want but people at this age no longer trust the markets and they can not afford to trust it either.

It's getting so bad that we are now seeing the rumors about negative interest rates. The markets are so desperate for anything to keep them inflated. In places closer to doing this the people are not investing. They are simply pulling their money.

By rewarding the corrupt the last 8 years we have created an untrustworthy system. It's not going to end well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 06:41 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by TristramShandy View Post
We're already at the lowest home ownership rate since at least 1965 (which is as far back as the Census Bureau has tracked it). With the student loan debt and, in many cases, late start to getting real careers for millenials, it would plunge even further if that happened.
The median age for first marriages in the US in 1959-60 was 22.8 for men and 20.3 for women.

The median age for first marriage has been increasing ever since. This is consistent with trends throughout the developed world, including those countries that pick up the tab for college for " qualified" students and thus no student loan debt load.

Most parents would be far from thrilled if their sons/ daughters were to marry at ages 22 and 20.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top