Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Police are looking for more information Friday after video surfaced of a woman beating a man on the Metro Blue Line in Long Beach after he allegedly yelled racial epithets at her.
According to the witness the woman broke the non-aggression principle...meaning she initiated force in a situation that wasn't self-defense.
No mention of what word was used. No mention of the "races" although the video shows the woman to be dark-skinned with the victim having light skin.
Two points/questions...
1. I find it fascinating that KTLA won't tell us which slur was used or identify the "races" of the folks involved.
2. Do our resident Black Panther wannabes have alibis for the night in question?
Here's a better quality video of the incident. Rated R for language and violence my special snowflakes:
1. I find it fascinating that KTLA won't tell us which slur was used or identify the "races" of the folks involved.
2. Do our resident Black Panther wannabes have alibis for the night in question?
...
Maybe they don't know the races of those involved.
Not really important. Provided that what was said really was a slur, a slur is a slur. If I get run over by an 18-wheeler, it doesn't really matter which of its wheels ran over me.
Maybe they don't know the races of those involved.
[not that it matters]
It always matters which races were involved.
All this PC nonsense.
Watch the news where the public is told to call the police if they see a suspect.
Yeah, if you see the suspect described as a male, between the ages of 16 and 65, wearing a blue shirt and dark pants with black hair...
And they rarely if ever mention race. Why? Because the chances are it would be other than white and can't have that, the perception would be more people if color were comitting crimes.
If race isn't important in such stories then why do liberals always bring it up when talking about arrest rates? Easy answer, because in cities like Oakland and Chicago to name just two, blacks kill blacks in record numbers and commit crimes out of proportion to their representation as a race in the population.
But let's not talk about rates crimes are comitted vs arrests because the PC crowd is too busy trying to convince everyone that arrests for crimes in cities where minorities commit a large percentace of the crime because they represent a large oercentage of the local populations just isn't fair, the arrests should be in accordance with the population as a whole.
Not really important. Provided that what was said really was a slur, a slur is a slur. If I get run over by an 18-wheeler, it doesn't really matter which of its wheels ran over me.
[ouch]
So you're a fan of either
A. P*** poor journalism
B. Censorship
Some of like to know what was ascertained at the scene.
I was generous and gave you the not knowing of "races" although the video clearly shows the woman with dark skin.
The slur I won't play the obtuse game though. The teen interviewed surely knew the slur used. Report it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
