Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-20-2016, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,595,087 times
Reputation: 29385

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Actually, we have. Just not as much as many of us would like.
(I vividly remember seeing as a child the newspaper photos of emmett till, who was lynched for wolf-whistling at a white woman.)

Note that witnesses helped out and did not pile on to the black man. It really is progress.


You may call them 'not piling on the black man "progress"', but I call it 1970.

That you're using that as a barometer for how we've progressed, proves my point that we haven't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-20-2016, 04:28 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,910 posts, read 10,582,210 times
Reputation: 16439
Does not sound like a serious attack. Probably a punk trying to make a name for himself. I've heard of blacks attacking interracial couples when the woman is black and man is white.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 04:32 PM
 
72,971 posts, read 62,554,457 times
Reputation: 21871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
Those laws were before my time tho: some of them were just dumb; like a Mexican could NOT marry a Filipino cause the Philipino was Asian and, ALL Mexicans, even dark skinned Indians, were tagged as "white" back in the day.

My x fiance: a blue eyed blond lady with DayGlo white skin; she has "Black girl" face features, where they came through we don't know cause both her parents were anglo white.
I suspect those features could have to do with some Native American ancestry from a long time ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 04:43 PM
 
2,248 posts, read 2,346,625 times
Reputation: 4234
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalmove View Post
Most people are still a little put off seeing Blacks and Whites in a physical relationship.
It is difficult for the families of both involved, and rarely works out in the long run.
It may become more acceptable as time passes, but could take centuries.
Just my observation.
Any statistical proof or just more conjecture? You haven't even met 15% of the worlds population, so how can you conclude what "most" people are put off on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 04:48 PM
 
Location: annandale, va & slidell, la
9,267 posts, read 5,115,170 times
Reputation: 8471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Railman96 View Post
Any statistical proof or just more conjecture? You haven't even met 15% of the worlds population, so how can you conclude what "most" people are put off on?
We could carry out a simple experiment, but I doubt you would find the result to your liking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 04:51 PM
 
6,393 posts, read 4,111,578 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
This is a bigoted and hateful statement. Take it back please.
You a history revisionist?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,735,298 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
You may call them 'not piling on the black man "progress"', but I call it 1970.

That you're using that as a barometer for how we've progressed, proves my point that we haven't.
Loving v. Virginia was decided in 1967, and was bitterly resented.

I don't think that there is a state today where a majority of voters would support prohibiting interracial marriage, but in 1970 there sure were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,595,087 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Loving v. Virginia was decided in 1967, and was bitterly resented.

I don't think that there is a state today where a majority of voters would support prohibiting interracial marriage, but in 1970 there sure were.
I'm aware. That was almost 50 years ago and you still have people in this thread saying most people aren't comfortable seeing a white woman flirting with a man who wasn't white.

Not enough progress, in my mind. Not after fifty years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,735,298 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
I'm aware. That was almost 50 years ago and you still have people in this thread saying most people aren't comfortable seeing a white woman flirting with a man who wasn't white.
And you think that c-d posters are representative of the population as a whole?


Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
Not enough progress, in my mind. Not after fifty years.
Not as much as I'd like, for sure.

But for the past eight years, a black man has been president. You can choose to focus on the people who can't stand that fact, or you can focus on the people who approve of him. In spite of the hatred that's been directed at him, his favorability ratings for this stage of his presidency are healthy, and compare well with other post WWII presidents.

Bad enough there are crazy racists walking our streets. Don't let them inhabit your head as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2016, 06:02 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,895,818 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
And you think that c-d posters are representative of the population as a whole?




Not as much as I'd like, for sure.

But for the past eight years, a black man has been president. You can choose to focus on the people who can't stand that fact, or you can focus on the people who approve of him. In spite of the hatred that's been directed at him, his favorability ratings for this stage of his presidency are healthy, and compare well with other post WWII presidents.

Bad enough there are crazy racists walking our streets. Don't let them inhabit your head as well.
Obama's half "Black"; tho racists on BOTH sides tag him as full "Black", I still see the POTUS as mixed race.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top