Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2016, 08:58 AM
 
17,350 posts, read 9,180,345 times
Reputation: 11805

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Powell received 2 emails that were classified, there is no indication as to what level but he has said it was mundane stuff that may have been "upclassified" such as the thousands of Clinton emails.

Clinton on the other hand sent or received 110 emails that were classified at the time they were sent and received including material classified as TOP SECRET/SAP.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

Neither should have been using anything but a government email account but trying to compare what Powell did to Clinton is a joke.
It's not a "joke" - it was an attempted Cover-Up for Clinton's Private Server & failure to follow her OATH.
The State Department crawled back over a Decade to find 2 emails SENT to Secretary Powell and up-grade them to "confidential". That's Corruption & the US State Department is loaded with it.

They expect the American public to vilify Powell as some sort of equivalence to Hillary Clinton's Secret Server Scandal ..... to give her a 'pass'. That's more than Disgusting. Powell is correct to finally fight back against these low-lifes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:02 AM
 
34,620 posts, read 21,506,627 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
9/11 was NEVER linked to saddam. in fact bush even pointed that out.
Let's keep in mind that it was the Czech counterintelligence agency that made the claim 9/11 hijacker Atta met with officials from Iraq in Prague.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moha...gue_connection

Quote:
On October 26, Czech Republic Interior Minister Stanislav Gross responded by calling a press conference at which he "confirms" that Atta "did make contact with an officer of the Iraqi intelligence" in Prague, namely al-Ani, who was later expelled from the country.[7]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:03 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,478,718 times
Reputation: 4620
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo101 View Post


In the meantime we have the right trying desperately to make a strawman out of a few mislabeled emails by Hillary Clinton.
I know you desperately want her extreme carelessness limited to Only those three emails. You can then ignore the other ways she played fast and loose with U.S. security, such as using her personal email in territory of sophisticated, hostile adversaries. The FBI found multiple instances of her 'carelessness,' but hey, you'll stick to those three emails as the be all and end all of her putting personal convenience above national security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Huntsville, AL
2,852 posts, read 1,601,582 times
Reputation: 5445
Keep in mind, anything Hilary says is questionable...
SHE'S A LIAR - WHAT DON'T PEOPLE UNDERSTAND ABOUT THIS 'WOMAN'....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:29 AM
 
7,280 posts, read 10,908,477 times
Reputation: 11491
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo101 View Post
Speaking of lying, Mr Powell tell us again about all those WMDs that were supposed to be in Iraq.
Quite a difference between knowing and relating and knowing wrong and doing it anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:33 AM
 
17,390 posts, read 11,924,088 times
Reputation: 16136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
This has been the case for other secretaries of state. Powell can say what he wants now but investigations indicate differently.





State Dept. Concludes Past Secretaries Of State "Definitively" Handled Classified Information On Private Email
Private emails accounts are hardly private servers installed in your home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:35 AM
 
17,390 posts, read 11,924,088 times
Reputation: 16136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Such a difficult time telling "sent from" from "sent to".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:39 AM
 
26,931 posts, read 15,147,331 times
Reputation: 11933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Typical Democrat. Anything to deflect from Hillary's lies and corruption.

Blame it on others and make excuses.

Just as Hillary, trying to put her lies and faults on others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:43 AM
 
41,815 posts, read 50,883,218 times
Reputation: 17863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
She had 3 emails that were marked as classified,
There was three that were marked but part of Clinton and her staff's job is identify, classify and use the classified system for these communications. Either she and her staff are complete morons that can't identify classified material or they did it for their own reasons. Some of this material was TOP Secret/SAP s oit's not like it's mundane every day communications they were discussing.

Quote:
the others you mentioned were not marked as classified when received.

Sent and Received...


Quote:
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.

..........


For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:48 AM
 
41,815 posts, read 50,883,218 times
Reputation: 17863
double post

Last edited by thecoalman; 08-22-2016 at 10:31 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top