Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-27-2016, 09:10 AM
 
19,718 posts, read 10,124,301 times
Reputation: 13086

Advertisements

20 years from now, the AGW people will have another agenda to push, after countries waste trillions and the rich get richer.

 
Old 08-27-2016, 09:13 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
So you are saying that the climate is changing but it is irrespective of man's impact. You deniers need to get on the same page. Half of you are saying that there is no climate change at all, and half of you say that the climate IS changing but it isn't as a result of human activities.
Taking a trip from LA to NYC via a commercial jet leaves a carbon footprint a third the size of a US citizen's carbon footprint for the entire year and a carbon footprint over half of what a European makes in an entire year.

Should we ban all nonessential air transportation, especially leisure travel?

This is a question for everyone who believes man is changing the climate
Actually, don't answer here, I'm going to do a poll on another thread.
 
Old 08-27-2016, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kode View Post
There is something horribly wrong with every one of your sentences. You're denying reality and facts. Exxon-Mobile said so in 1977.





The Bering Straights used to be called the Bering Land Bridge.


NEXT!
 
Old 08-27-2016, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
1,050 posts, read 505,729 times
Reputation: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
And NOTHING man can do will change it. The climate changes, FACT, it has changed since the earth began FACT.

Just another "the U.S. is evil and everything WE do is killing something,someone. WE are the problem, not anyone/anything else, just US.

You will notice that all these doomsayers are making millions off of their predictions/solutions and daily get in their private jets and fly all over the place to their private mansions that have a larger carbon footprint (whatever the hell that is supposed to be ) than 5-10 normal families.

Cry me a river, seriously, please, as we're in a drought....

As for the ocean rise, maybe there's too many new cruise ships/yachts bobbing around and that's raising the levels? Lets take out some of 'em and see if the levels go down? Kind of like putting more ice in your kale smoothy, the level goes up right?
You are less than inadequately informed. If it weren't for right wing propaganda and gullibility, you would not be saying such things. All your arguments have been debunked long ago.
 
Old 08-27-2016, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
1,050 posts, read 505,729 times
Reputation: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
The Bering Straights used to be called the Bering Land Bridge.


NEXT!
And that is supposed to be a refutation??? LOL!!!!
 
Old 08-27-2016, 09:35 AM
 
Location: USA
18,492 posts, read 9,161,666 times
Reputation: 8525
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Taking a trip from LA to NYC via a commercial jet leaves a carbon footprint a third the size of a US citizen's carbon footprint for the entire year and a carbon footprint over half of what a European makes in an entire year.

Should we ban all nonessential air transportation, especially leisure travel?

This is a question for everyone who believes man is changing the climate
Actually, don't answer here, I'm going to do a poll on another thread.
Yes, air travel puts a huge amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. While the MPG/passenger of commercial air travel is comparable to automobile transport, the miles-traveled is high.

I believe that AGW is real, so I rarely take vacations that require air travel. I take more local vacations. It saves a ton of $$$ too. There's a lot of neat stuff within a short drive of where I live, so it's not a big sacrifice.
 
Old 08-27-2016, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
1,050 posts, read 505,729 times
Reputation: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Taking a trip from LA to NYC via a commercial jet leaves a carbon footprint a third the size of a US citizen's carbon footprint for the entire year and a carbon footprint over half of what a European makes in an entire year.

Should we ban all nonessential air transportation, especially leisure travel?
Not until we analyze this and determine how this compares, per person, to carbon emissions resulting from driving the average car to make the same trip because in many cases that would be the alternative.

Let's see... "a carbon footprint a third the size of a US citizen's carbon footprint for the entire year".

So that would be a "a carbon footprint the size of a US citizen's carbon footprint for 4 months" or about 120 days. Divide that by the average number of passengers on such a flight. That seems to be about 100. 120/100=1.2

So each passenger's share of the carbon footprint (using these calculations if they are valid) created by flying from LA to NYC would be equal to that person's carbon footprint for 1.2 days.

Any carbon is not good, but the original wording makes it sound absolutely horrible. Not so when it is broken down.

Last edited by Kode; 08-27-2016 at 10:20 AM..
 
Old 08-27-2016, 10:08 AM
 
19,718 posts, read 10,124,301 times
Reputation: 13086
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
The Bering Straights used to be called the Bering Land Bridge.


NEXT!
Actually it was called "Beringia".
 
Old 08-27-2016, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,369 posts, read 19,162,886 times
Reputation: 26255
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Well, you can see that the scientifically illiterate make up most posters on threads about climate change. No matter how hard you try, these folks are hard wired to reject science through years of conditioning from denialist websites and FAUX News.
I just want to get on the scam and milk a few million from some gullible fools for some perceived solution to a problem that is genned up with no real solution....want to join the scam on the profit side.

When the proponents of GW stop taking private jets across the planet to tell others they have to turn out their lights, start using sail and row boats, feet and bikes for travel, and turn off their lights, I'll take them seriously.
 
Old 08-27-2016, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Concord NC
1,863 posts, read 1,653,765 times
Reputation: 5175
As long as the flock are willing to be shorn, the shears will continue to appear in one guise or another.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top