Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Let's be clear here. The affirmation of the lower court ruling was only because the Supreme Court was deadlocked, 4-4. This question will be decided based on who wins the election. If Trump gets to nominate Scalia's replacement, then these laws will ultimately stand, as they should. If Hillary appoints a far left wing zealot to the Court, then they will be invalidated.
Ummm...yeah, I read it. And...? What was your point? Why did you waste time cutting and pasting?
Are not the new voting laws requiring a more restricted number of acceptable IDs? You mentioned Canada required voter ID but I was just clarifying that it does not require government issue voter ID.
An interesting case of voter fraud did occur in Ontario in the 1800s where at one polling station the Liberal beat the Conservative (or the other way round) by a 11 to 10 count out of the 8 eligible voters. Back them beer was involved.
Status:
"Astros need a strong spring."
(set 9 days ago)
Location: Suburban Dallas
52,601 posts, read 47,778,949 times
Reputation: 33698
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14
The courts disagree with you. Too bad, so sad.
Meanwhile, all those people the Republicans tried so hard to disenfranchise are going to be out in force in November, letting the GOP know how they feel about that. I look forward to it.
Not so fast. Not every left-winger likes Hillary, and I would think that many North Carolinians would have some semblance of common sense when going to their precincts to vote.
It's documented that Republicans win with low turnout so they have to scheme to prevent certain citizens from exercising their RIGHT to vote. Republicans are supposed to be more religious but they do everything to stop "Souls to the Polls."
"so they have to scheme to prevent certain citizens from exercising their RIGHT to vote.'
It is highly particular why a right that says Citizen, there is no requirement to prove you are in fact a citizen, but a right that says People, you have to prove you are a citizen??
Aww, you poor thing, reverting to baby talk because things didn't go your way. There, there. It will be okay.
No it won't be O. K. We will have another crooked election where people from Jersey illegally vote and blacks will brag they voted 6 times again.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
