Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Then you can take your own oath to defend the DC heiarchy and live as a subject under whomever happens to be at the White House. You really should examine the history of this nation a bit closer. Our loyalty , as citizens, is contingent upon the federal government minding it's place. Much as I hate to cite Lincoln 'Of the People, by the People and for the People' does have a ring to it. I would like to see what 'crime' it is you are citing that makes it illegal to oppose an instituting of dictatorial rule by the Federal government. Could you show me chapter and verse please? The 2nd ammendment IS in there for a reason.
You can oppose it.... at the ballot box. Opposing it by force of arms is treason.
please read the oath of the united States of America that politicians are supposed to uphold. that oath includes supporting and defending the Constitution of the USA, not defile it as they have already.
also, if you go by our last civil war, those that lived in the south were not tried for treason, as once they were seceded and no longer in the union and could not be tried for treason since they were no longer citizens of the USA.
Good thing you aren't trying to make your living as a lawyer monkey.
You can oppose it.... at the ballot box. Opposing it by force of arms is treason.
You answered your own question. Alaska votes for soveriegn state, montana means to assert it's right to cede if it so chooses. That is the ballot box. Why are you still talking when you have no point at all? Or is the purpose just to have the last word?
You answered your own question. Alaska votes for soveriegn state, montana means to assert it's right to cede if it so chooses. That is the ballot box. Why are you still talking when you have no point at all? Or is the purpose just to have the last word?
Alaska passes a resolution claiming something under the 10th Amendment. Fascinating, who decides if such a resolution has any force at all? Tell us.
Alaska passes a resolution claiming something under the 10th Amendment. Fascinating, who decides if such a resolution has any force at all? Tell us.
normally the federal goverment.
but, if the state in question feels that its 10th Amendment rights have been violated by the same federal goverment, they can disregard it completely, as the 12 colonies did against the 13th colony rhode island back in our founding fathers day.
but, if the state in question feels that its 10th Amendment rights have been violated by the same federal goverment, they can disregard it completely, as the 12 colonies did against the 13th colony rhode island back in our founding fathers day.
Actually they can't and the answer is that the US Supreme Court decides. Always
Yes even when the idiots in the South thought that they could oppose the decisions by force of arms. Whatever it takes the Union will prevail.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
