Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2016, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Vladivostok Russia
1,229 posts, read 858,809 times
Reputation: 608

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suburban_Guy View Post
What a mess, but sweet deal for the people that benefit/will benefit from this (no offense intended towards those here who fit the description).

How a pension deal went wrong and cost California taxpayers billions - Los Angeles Times
Mark it down - When the bond and derivatives markets crash, every one of those pensions will undergo severe haircuts. Every one of them.

There is simply not enough production to sustain them. And the printing scheme eventually collapses on-top of itself once the dollar is pushed out of the reserve currency status - and either a morphed gold standard or an equal-weighted basket of currencies replaces it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2016, 09:34 AM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,929,155 times
Reputation: 6763
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
Oh. Except you responded to a comment about all public employees, not just the ones in the referenced article.
You are the one shuffling, not too much difference in state employees or government......but hey! whatever, you're the one moving the goalpost, while accusing others of not understanding!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 09:42 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,319 posts, read 60,489,441 times
Reputation: 60906
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds View Post
You are the one shuffling, not too much difference in state employees or government......but hey! whatever, you're the one moving the goalpost, while accusing others of not understanding!
I understand perfectly. Blame the employees. That's the soup du jour for most of you guys.

I realize that I'm on the other coast but I paid into my pension every single paycheck for 32 years. The last few years at a higher rate than other retirement system employees. That higher differential went to balance the General Fund and not to the pension system. It was called the Teacher Tax.

Now we have guys like you saying that we don't deserve it. I could have taken that 5%, and later 7%, and invested it for a better return than 32% of final year gross than I'm getting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 03:34 PM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,929,155 times
Reputation: 6763
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
I understand perfectly. Blame the employees. That's the soup du jour for most of you guys.

I realize that I'm on the other coast but I paid into my pension every single paycheck for 32 years. The last few years at a higher rate than other retirement system employees. That higher differential went to balance the General Fund and not to the pension system. It was called the Teacher Tax.

Now we have guys like you saying that we don't deserve it. I could have taken that 5%, and later 7%, and invested it for a better return than 32% of final year gross than I'm getting.
Look this article isn't about you or your state. Your state may be able to handle the cost, California is not going to be able to handle this. If you pay for your pension than more power to you. The article is stating the taxpayers of California are going to have to pay into this retirement plan, whether they like it or not. How is this fair to those that get no pension at the end of 32 years, why should you and others be special in life, off the backs of taxpayers?


Did you even read the article?
The average retirement age for CHP officers is 54. Someone that age without a pension who wanted to buy an annuity to generate the same income for life would have to pay more than $2.6 million, according to Fidelity Investments. Few Americans have that kind of nest egg.
About a third of those between 55 and 64 have no retirement savings, according to Alicia Munnell, who was an economic advisor to President Bill Clinton and is now director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. For those with savings, the median was $111,000 in 2013, she said.


“If I was in the private sector just struggling to get by, had no dream of retiring, would I be upset?†Hamm asked during a recent interview. “Yeah. And we have to understand that’s a reality.â€
Joe Nation, a former Democratic assemblyman who teaches public policy at Stanford’s Institute for Economic Policy Research, sees the same reality bearing down on public employees. He believes their sweetened pensions are not sustainable.
“There’s no way to close this gap without some sort of hit, or financial pain, for those employees,†he said.


If a Democrat can see this, not sure why you can't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 03:54 PM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,966,236 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by froglipz View Post
Public employees also have the right to expect what was promised as part of their employment compensation! Don't provide pensions and see the labor pool dry up.
Just because they have the power of the government behind them, doesn't mean they should take advantage. Lots of folks lost their pensions when the economy tanked, and round themselves with less than they expected. The difference is that they weren't able to make the difference up through mandatory taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 03:56 PM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,966,236 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds View Post
Then these people should have to work until 62 or 70, like the government wants the rest of us to do. Retiring at 50-55 is a waste of time and money.



Most likely they would cry to the government and viola, $$$ start pouring in!
They can retire, they just don't get a pension until they turn 70, like everybody else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2016, 05:27 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,132,426 times
Reputation: 13661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Just move out of CA. Let the remaining Leftists pay for all of this BS.
That's what my husband and I plan to do.

I'm just fed up with my husband and I paying exorbitant taxes so that illegals and entitled government employees can be pampered for life in this overcrowded desert state.

I like colder weather anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2016, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,587,825 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
Though I am sure Davis got along with the Democrat legislature to pass that, that was not the main problem.
There are two we inherited.

#1 Jerry (Moonbeam) Brown signed into law in his first term decades ago the UNIONIZING OF STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES TO MOSTLY IMO TRANSFER DONATIONS FROM UNIONS TO THE STATE DEMOCRAT PARTY. PAY TO PLAY!

#2 Jerry Brown decades ago in an earlier term also gave our water away back to the north causing us a permanent state of drought. Anyone with historic knowledge of California knows the south was not allowed to expand by millions until we had water rights. We had them and after a few good years of rain Moonbeam gave them away.

I don't know how that wasn't illegal to do or why the voters forgot and haven't already chased Brown out of state with tar and feathers.
Brown's father lost the governorship for giving the north's water to the south. You don't think he would have remembered that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2016, 08:22 PM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,929,155 times
Reputation: 6763
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
They can retire, they just don't get a pension until they turn 70, like everybody else.
Another poster who failed to read the article. Hard to have a reasonable debate when people fail to read the OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2016, 08:24 PM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,929,155 times
Reputation: 6763
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
That's what my husband and I plan to do.

I'm just fed up with my husband and I paying exorbitant taxes so that illegals and entitled government employees can be pampered for life in this overcrowded desert state.

I like colder weather anyway.
It is really too bad, because CA is the best state in my opinion. We left almost 30 yrs ago because self-employment was getting harder and harder to have any success.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top