Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-28-2016, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,004 posts, read 25,978,952 times
Reputation: 15503

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
The families were each paid an average of $1.8 million from the 9/11 Victim Fund. The challenge was and remains that many of the victims were very high earners.

Prior to 9/11, no one imagined that terrorists would fly airplanes into large buildings with the intent of causing buildings to collapse with people within, on live TV.

It remains a mystery to me that these 2 planes did not his at lower floors, thereby trapping a majority of people and causing a faster collapse. Pilot error or a desire to protract?
If these families went after Saudi Arabia exposing their backing of radical terrorists I would be supportive, but suing for more money 15 years later at the expense of the country.


They were successful at lobbying the release of classified information on Saudi Arabia but this action will damage the US and set a precedent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-28-2016, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,095,029 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
What does NIC stand for?
Well CIC is Commander-in-chief...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2016, 08:45 PM
 
15,492 posts, read 10,426,487 times
Reputation: 15747
"Obama Veto Reversed"

Good
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 12:10 AM
 
Location: world
1,529 posts, read 911,523 times
Reputation: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
And when we are sued for all the damage the American military has done?
What's wrong with that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 12:12 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,655,544 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox Terrier View Post


And the other sad part of this is within two years, Obama will be blamed for all the lawsuits against the US. Or Hillary will, since she will be prez then.

Right-wingers will forget ALL about how this actually happened.
Oh no they won't. This will be laid at the feet of Republicans and it is our job to remind them of that. They want the lawsuits, then Republicans should be prepared to pay for them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
It's about time the NIC got his ass handed to him What arrogance and what a sellout. The only thing he has not thrown under the bus at some point in his bride. How many days left?
I'm glad you are willing to pay for these lawsuits. What is an NIC? I hope it's not as racist as it appears but I've never seen NIC before.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
What does NIC stand for?
That's what I want to know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Well CIC is Commander-in-chief...
Yep, that's exactly what I thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 05:34 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,004 posts, read 25,978,952 times
Reputation: 15503
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Well CIC is Commander-in-chief...
Yes I assume it is just a typo by one of the deplorables.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 05:41 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,479,823 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
Doesn't it seem like Obama and like-minded others are talking out of both sides of their mouth? They're always talking about the global community and globalism, but suddenly their argument is this law will cause the US to lose sovereign immunity.
This is really quite simple. Barack Obama is the most effective enemy this country has ever faced. Here he was siding with the Saudis, who were the benefactors for the 9/11 terrorists, at our expense.

The Democrats have for the most part partnered with Obama on this sort of agenda pretty consistently during his time in office. But now one month before a national election, they are feeling the heat of accountability a little bit. Under pressure, they have decided to do the right thing for a change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 05:43 AM
 
Location: Florida
77,013 posts, read 47,448,627 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmitri95 View Post
Who will sue us?
It will probably be in the thousands. An army of US lawyers will get on planes to talk people into suing US. They get their cut of course, which is why they'll do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 05:45 AM
 
Location: Florida
77,013 posts, read 47,448,627 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox Terrier View Post
The families got two million dollars each from the US government.
And now, 15 years later, they want more. Everyone feels for the families, but clearly this is more about money than anything else. This will help the families by putting an additional million, or two in their pockets, but the nation as whole is worse off, which is why the Congress is being very stupid about this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 05:55 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,004 posts, read 25,978,952 times
Reputation: 15503
The veto was overridden in the house. The families can now sue Saudi Arabia in US court if they can prove their connection, that in itself may be a problem. The other side of this is that residents in foreign countries may also sue the US for our actions supporting terrorists. It will be interesting to see if some residents of Nicaragua file a lawsuit regarding our support of terror since it is quite clearly the case, Reagan and other cabinet member's admittedly supported the Contras. Fairly easy to prove their case.


Quote:
Marking a significant defeat for the White House, the House ensured the bill will become law after voting 348-77 to override Wednesday afternoon. This followed a 97-1 vote hours earlier in the Senate.
Despite last-ditch warnings from the Obama administration that the legislation could hurt national security and was “badly misguided,” lawmakers dismissed the concerns.
Congress rejects Obama veto of 9/11 bill, in first override of presidency | Fox News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top