Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is classic news baiting by the trump campaign about getting the focus on Clinton's rapes and assaults and Hillary's blind support for someone who has been accused of over a dozen assaults in last 40 years.
Media is forced to review bill's horrid past, Clinton's impeachment, all the poor history by Clinton.
And despite it all, he left office with an off the chart favorability rating. Go figure, eh.
Yes, you leave the nasty stuff to forces you can claim to be unaffiliated with.
All this stuff detracts from the issues.
I think Trump could beat Hillary if he just focused on trade and I abhor protectionism just recognize the popularity of it at this time.
I too favor free trade and agree that if Trump stayed on message he could win.
During the primary, when initially asked about his past comments about women, he could have immediately diffused the whole deal and said they were inappropriate, apologized and moved on. The US people love it when someone owns their mistakes.
You seem to have no problem with the Clintons using their foundation to hide their money and not paying taxes. One thing you and Hillary fail to understand the man has businesses all over that employ thousands of people.......who do the Clintons employ? Also, I don't think Trump will be taking items from the WH, like the Clintons did, they most likely only returned the things they were caught STEALING!
The purpose of family foundations is to avoid taxes.
Both Clinton and Trump have FAMILY foundations that grant monies to other 501 ( c) 3 orgs.
The Clintons also maintain the Clinton Foundation ( very different from the family foundation) which accepts grants and donations from the public and uses funds to operate direct charities to achieve their humanitarian purposes. It recieves a 4 out of 4 rating from independent rating orgs.
That this foundation operated while Hillary was SoS and accepted donations from people who might reasonably be expected to recieve something in return was a huge mistake. There is no way to prove or disprove Pay for Play. The Clintons deserve every bit of ctitisism. They created their own vulnerability.
Have there ever been two more seriously flawed nominees?
Without a rape conviction this is just stupid talk. Extremely stupid talk.
Juanit went bloodied up to other people about it, but Clinton had the power to hit her down and sometimes law breakers with power get away, just ask Hillary who we all know is guilty in real life of many felonies with the email.
A level headed, common sense approach doesn't usually shock anybody. So that wasn't my intent with this post. My opinion is that Trump needs to focus on the issues and tune out the deplorables...
"A level headed, common sense approach doesn't usually shock anybody."
Says the poster who through out RACISM at every turn and now wants to talk about level headed and common sense.
Without a rape conviction this is just stupid talk. Extremely stupid talk.
So as a general topic, you believe any women's claim of rape is nullified if there is no conviction.
Very enlightened of you.(sarcasm inserted here).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.