Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The internet is owned by private companies that only care that the users buy the advertisers crap. This is somehow vastly better than government ownership and control.
Someone has to pay for all those resources. Better it be the people profiting from the web than taxpayers who may not.
No. Can't with the factually challenged people today. Just can't.
I'm having this reaction too!
How disappointed they're going to be as the internet rolls on without a hitch and they remain able to be ignorant in public for everyone to see. They'd MUCH rather it came to a screeching halt.
How disappointed they're going to be as the internet rolls on without a hitch and they remain able to be ignorant in public for everyone to see. They'd MUCH rather it came to a screeching halt.
Oh well, I have chickens to feed right now...
If there is going to be no affect why would the UN even care about this or push for this?
If there is going to be no affect why would the UN even care about this or push for this?
Because the UN DID NO SUCH THING.
ICANN is an international consortium. It has been "housed" with the US, but the intention has always been that it should be a stand-alone organization.
Read this, and learn something. Then do some googling, and read things OTHER than what is posted on breitbart or infowars or....
ICANN is an international consortium. It has been "housed" with the US, but the intention has always been that it should be a stand-alone organization.
Read this, and learn something. Then do some googling, and read things OTHER than what is posted on breitbart or infowars or....
There are a lot of people in this thread who do not understand what is happening and stating that other people do not know. It was the United States Internet, The UN did want control of it, in part because some of its members are threatened by the freedom of information.
There was no reason to change it other than to give some oppressive regimes a shot at limiting the freedom of information.
There are a lot of people in this thread who do not understand what is happening and stating that other people do not know. It was the United States Internet, The UN did want control of it, in part because some of its members are threatened by the freedom of information.
There was no reason to change it other than to give some oppressive regimes a shot at limiting the freedom of information.
Americans are less than 10% of internet users. There are servers located in any number of countries, mostly owned by private companies. The underlying technology is well-understood and now nearly universal, if the internet disappeared tomorrow, any number of computer engineers in all parts of the world could start it up again. In what sense, then, does the internet belong to the US?
Americans are less than 10% of internet users. There are servers located in any number of countries, mostly owned by private companies.
Way to surrender your main point and admit you are wrong. We are making progress!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg
The underlying technology is well-understood and now nearly universal, if the internet disappeared tomorrow, any number of computer engineers in all parts of the world could start it up again. In what sense, then, does the internet belong to the US?
I understand you do not understand, which is why you should not have talked about other people not understanding. Anyone else is free to create their own Internet, and some have. Whether people decide to use a Chinese controlled Internet would have been interesting.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.