Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Soooo... Does anyone else find it troubling that the guy who wants his finger on the button would trust his gut over the judgement of many independent intelligence agencies?
His intelligence briefing tells him that there was some rogue agents doing something, but he reeeeally thinks it was N. Korea so... *Boom*?
"over the judgement of many independent intelligence agencies?
Soooo... Does anyone else find it troubling that the guy who wants his finger on the button would trust his gut over the judgement of many independent intelligence agencies?
His intelligence briefing tells him that there was some rogue agents doing something, but he reeeeally thinks it was N. Korea so... *Boom*?
and just how good have our intelligence agencies been??
17 "intelligence" agencies could not prevent 9-11. 17 "intelligence" agencies all said there were WMD's in Iraq. 17 "intelligence" agencies did not predict the fall of the old Soviet Union. Not exactly a group of people we should trust given their massive failures in intelligence.
17 "intelligence" agencies could not prevent 9-11. 17 "intelligence" agencies all said there were WMD's in Iraq. 17 "intelligence" agencies did not predict the fall of the old Soviet Union. Not exactly a group of people we should trust given their massive failures in intelligence.
All of your assertions are incorrect. Our intelligence agencies had information and alerted our government and administrations to these occurrences.
Soooo... Does anyone else find it troubling that the guy who wants his finger on the button would trust his gut over the judgement of many independent intelligence agencies?
His intelligence briefing tells him that there was some rogue agents doing something, but he reeeeally thinks it was N. Korea so... *Boom*?
Hillary's "intelligence agencies" include the DNC, CNN, MSNBC, HuffPoo, NYT, etc, etc. No facts to back up her claims. Now...if Russia or anyone else can so readily "hack" the DNCs servers...exactly what does it say for the unsecured home PC she used for classified government work? How much did that cost this country, in terms of lives and sources lost? She commits a criminal act and tries to deflect by accusing Trump of being Putin's butt buddy. I don't think even her supporters are dumb enough to buy that one.
The State dep reg server has been hacked. The OPM has been hacked. There's been hacking at the DOD - the White House. Etc. it happens.
And, not one of those supposed agencies has officially said anything.
"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations."
"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations."
"What? Who are those yahoos? Let me know when Alex Jones corroborates this." -CD Conservatives
Apparently pointing out how Conservatives rely on boogeymen & conspiracy theories to debunk facts from professional agencies has struck a nerve w/ the PTB since all of those posts were deleted...
The State dep reg server has been hacked. The OPM has been hacked. There's been hacking at the DOD - the White House. Etc. it happens.
Heck yeah they do. I hate getting the letters in the mail saying that our information could have been hacked to having the US government provide credit monitoring for husband, kids and myself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.