Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2016, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,534,555 times
Reputation: 18814

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Let's say I openly talked about my political leaning and have bumper stickers on my car.
Well if you are stupid enough to do that knowing who your boss is then maybe you deserve to be fired.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2016, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,843 posts, read 26,477,889 times
Reputation: 25741
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
For example, in 2008 election, I was working for a company that depended on Keystone project. After Obama rejected Keystone, my company started massive lay offs. My question is shouldn't those people who had Obama 2008 bumper stickers be let go first?
Sure. Your job depends on the survival and prosperity of the business. If you actively campaign against the best interests of the company and work to destroy the prosperity of the owners and stockholder, they absolutely should have the right to fire you. It's little different than sabotaging equipment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:02 PM
 
9,694 posts, read 7,385,183 times
Reputation: 9931
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
So if a woman get pregnant she could be fired? Or how about if the manager just doesn't like you or the manager hits on you and you refuse? Should those be grounds for termination?
yes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:05 PM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,156,553 times
Reputation: 12992
Why are you all so bent on taking away a person's right to vote their conscience?

The goals and needs of a company are not always in sync with those of it's employees. No matter what Mitt and the 2012 SCOTUS think A COMPANY IS NOT A PERSON and should have no rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,808 posts, read 6,386,331 times
Reputation: 9966
This is why you pretend to have voted for whoever your bosses support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:07 PM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,414,151 times
Reputation: 24961
Quote:
Originally Posted by blktoptrvl View Post
Why are you all so bent on taking away a person's right to vote their conscience?

The goals and needs of a company are not always in sync with those of it's employees. No matter what Mitt and the 2012 SCOTUS think A COMPANY IS NOT A PERSON and should have no rights.
Why are you against the right of two parties to negotiate an agreement without the violent interference of a third party?

Anyway:
"elections have consequences"- Barack Obama
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:08 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,801,560 times
Reputation: 25191
No, not at all, and it should be law against doing so.

All this would do is make it a practice that the party in power, could extend special benefits to companies in turn for leveraging their work force in order to vote to keep the party in power.

This just causes the government to use companies as the venue for establishing some autocratic form of government, whereas the government in itself cannot do things because of the Constitution, but uses companies as the vehicle for doing things.

I can see it now, the government extending wondering contracts to large corporations, in which they can use the funds to research their workforce to see who is advocating for what, and put out that if anyone votes for anyone other than who the company wants, they will be terminated. Walmart alone has 1.5 million employees in the US, and enough employees in many towns to sway elections in those towns.

Just imagine all the large corporations, Lockheed, Boeing, Saks, Walmart, etc, all deciding that they will order their employees to vote, and who to vote for, all under the threat of termination. They do this because the ruling political party has extended great contractual benefits to them. This is not the world I would ever want to live in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Lost in Montana *recalculating*...
19,743 posts, read 22,631,331 times
Reputation: 24902
Great.. another pillar of fascism being discussed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:11 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,553,800 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by blktoptrvl View Post
Why are you all so bent on taking away a person's right to vote their conscience?

The goals and needs of a company are not always in sync with those of it's employees. No matter what Mitt and the 2012 SCOTUS think A COMPANY IS NOT A PERSON and should have no rights.
Conscience??? LMAO.

Shouldn't people with any conscience NOT be working for an employer who holds different political views from them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,878,217 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by blktoptrvl View Post
Why are you all so bent on taking away a person's right to vote their conscience?

The goals and needs of a company are not always in sync with those of it's employees. No matter what Mitt and the 2012 SCOTUS think A COMPANY IS NOT A PERSON and should have no rights.
So it should be legal for a government body to discriminate against a wholly owned by African-Americans corporation?

Corporate personhood has a long history predating 2012.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top