Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
no.. the stimulus bill was mostly welfare. try to understand what is actually going on, if you're going to discuss issues
You mean welfare for states to plug their budget holes from the decreased revenue due to the economic crash of 2008?
Quote:
oooooh, tons of jobs.. just too many stupid people.. That the new talking point?
It's obvious you haven't been looking for a job. For grins, put in various small towns, various mid size, and various big cities into indeed.com and see what you get.
Trump’s plan would rely heavily on private funding,with the government encouraging investment through a tax credit that would raise the return to investors and lower the cost of borrowing to states and municipalities that would oversee the projects. Unlike Clinton’s plan, there would be no need for new taxes to finance spending. Tax credits would cost the government some money, but taxes collected from the workers and companies participating in such projects would offset the costs, according to Navarro and Ross. l
What does this actually mean? We have to wait for the investors to raise most of the money needed? How much is most?
"but taxes collected from the workers and companies participating in such projects would offset the costs," I have never heard of this as a way to help pay for a project. Workers taxes paying for the project???? So companies make an investment get a tax credit yet their taxes will help pay for it???? What am I missing?
What does this actually mean? We have to wait for the investors to raise most of the money needed? How much is most?
"but taxes collected from the workers and companies participating in such projects would offset the costs," I have never heard of this as a way to help pay for a project. Workers taxes paying for the project???? So companies make an investment get a tax credit yet their taxes will help pay for it???? What am I missing?
that's too technical for them to comprehend- they wont answer my question or yours-- so will continue to trash the past
that's too technical for them to comprehend- they wont answer my question or yours-- so will continue to trash the past
I will answer your question.
Are you living in a bubble or something?
You read something, but don't understand what you are reading.
This is not rocket science.
Millions of people are out of work, and millions of would be tax dollars are not there presently, therefore, nothing gets done.
The government, under a Trump administration, would probably get the ball rolling by initiating work projects through out the country.
Private contractors would be bidding on the contracts, and once secured, would be in charge of the projects being built, and hire workers who then would be paying taxes, which in turn would be used to pay for these projects.
Initial start up cost would be secured by the current tax codes,, bond issues, and private investment.
With new taxes being put into the system by new workers, investors would get paid, and these projects through out the country could move forward.
Are you living in a bubble or something?
You read something, but don't understand what you are reading.
This is not rocket science.
Millions of people are out of work, and millions of would be tax dollars are not there presently, therefore, nothing gets done.
The government, under a Trump administration, would probably get the ball rolling by initiating work projects through out the country.
Private contractors would be bidding on the contracts, and once secured, would be in charge of the projects being built, and hire workers who then would be paying taxes, which in turn would be used to pay for these projects.
Initial start up cost would be secured by the current tax codes,, bond issues, and private investment.
With new taxes being put into the system by new workers, investors would get paid, and these projects through out the country could move forward.
What part of that do you not understand?
Bob.
It could be structured very much in the way the US raised money in the early years of WW2. Before tax collections and Bonds had a large enough impact.
Every city, town, county and state would submit the projects that they see as most worthy, and then take bids from the private sector. Huge moneys would be needed on a multitude of projects. Much borrowing would be done, and there could be Fed guarantees on these loans as was in WW2 to hasten and secure the process. Tax credits could be used to encourage risk taking by private building industry.
Many more people would then be directly and indirectly employed both locally and nationally. GDP and tax collections would rise. No rockets needed.
Are you living in a bubble or something?
You read something, but don't understand what you are reading.
This is not rocket science.
Millions of people are out of work, and millions of would be tax dollars are not there presently, therefore, nothing gets done.
because of government manipulating the free market in housing. And you want the same entity to fix it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY
The government, under a Trump administration, would probably get the ball rolling by initiating work projects through out the country.
Private contractors would be bidding on the contracts, and once secured, would be in charge of the projects being built, and hire workers who then would be paying taxes, which in turn would be used to pay for these projects.
Initial start up cost would be secured by the current tax codes,, bond issues, and private investment.
With new taxes being put into the system by new workers, investors would get paid, and these projects through out the country could move forward.
What part of that do you not understand?
Bob.
It's not a tax problem, it's a spending problem.
The taxes collected on these workers on this project isn't significant since the actual taxes go into the general fund to pay for all the programs big government forces down our throat.
Here's the list on how government can help create jobs
1. Get out of the way
It could be structured very much in the way the US raised money in the early years of WW2. Before tax collections and Bonds had a large enough impact.
Every city, town, county and state would submit the projects that they see as most worthy, and then take bids from the private sector. Huge moneys would be needed on a multitude of projects. Much borrowing would be done, and there could be Fed guarantees on these loans as was in WW2 to hasten and secure the process. Tax credits could be used to encourage risk taking by private building industry.
Many more people would then be directly and indirectly employed both locally and nationally. GDP and tax collections would rise. No rockets needed.
Sounds like a plan to me!
Why do you want to give our wasteful and inefficient government more money to spend?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
