Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A former assistant deputy director of the FBI has what relevant inside information on the current intelligence community to make that claim? Considering he's no longer involved in the intelligence community his theory is as valid as the t-shirt vendor outside FBI headquarters.
People want links - I think the interview will air in full later today and then you'll all have mud on your face for believing anything Clinton says. Excuse me - the full interview will be released on Saturday.
good vid. reporter asks how Hillary is going to handle relations with Russia if she wins after she has accused them publicly of this espionage and attempting to influence the election. can't wait to hear her plan.
He only claims to have received the documents from someone other than the Russian government. The important thing is who accessed the email server and distributed the documents. It could've been a hacker team working for the Russians or another foreign government. It could've been a dissident employee who works in the US intelligence community. It could be someone within her campaign organization. The phishing attempt on Podesta sounds like it's neither of the above. It's someone who's an activist hacker or someone who's selling what he can pilfer to interested parties like foreign governments or privately-funded NGOs interested in disrupting the election.
I thought the FGI said there is no link between Russia and Trump.
This thread and the vid isn't about Trump and Russia, but about who provided the emails to wikileak. The Hillary campaign and Democrats have been accusing Russia of providing the hack emails to wikileaks. If it's true that the hack emails came from another source other than Russia, then their who campaign about Russia being behind the wikileaks would be false. This would damage Hillary's presidential campaign as there are numerous stories circulating about Russian being behind the hack emails. These stories would have zero credibility. At this point, a lot would depend on what Assange has to say and who his source is for the wikileaks. He could make a fool out of those Democrats, Hillary campaign, and any person who supported the Russian story about Russia providing the hack emails.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
