Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Roof is toast and will hopefully be put to death. If he doesn't deserve the death penalty for slaughtering innocent people, I don't know who does.
As to the cop Slager, if I remember correctly, he shot an unarmed guy in the back multiple times who was running away.
Unless there is something bizarre that I am unaware of, this is a clear case of abuse of authority. My understanding is that the only time a LEO is justified in shooting a fleeing suspect is if he poses an immediate threat to the public (i.e. murderer, escaped felon, etc.).
I never heard that this guy met that criteria, so I have no clue why this cop shot him to death.
Therefore based on what I have read/heard, he should be convicted of at least some type of homicide, probably murder 2 at most, manslaughter at the least.
The cops were nice to Roof and gave him a burger cuz he killed black people.
That's the angle.
I know, pretty insane but we are dealing with the SJW mentality here.
Well show me white cops giving an African American a hamburger fries and drink after they' murdered 9 innocent white Caucasian inside their church building.
And I will believe your twisted logic abour everything that you just said.
Riots and civil unrest typically don't occur in the wake of a mass tragedy like that; you didn't see that in Newtown, Aurora, Lynchburg, Oak Creek, etc. The Walter Scott shooting would be a much more appropriate example to cite.
What does typically occur in the wake of a mass tragedy is the obligatory (excuse me if I sound jaded) firearm lawsuits:
Quote:
...Lawyers for three people who survived the attack and the estates of five who were slain say the FBI negligently failed to conduct a thorough background check before Roof bought the gun last year.
If the agency had done its job, Roof's prior drug arrest would have shown up, and the bureau would have denied his purchase, the lawsuits filed Thursday allege.
Attorney Andy Savage said Friday that his clients hope the litigation will lead to improvements in gun safety. ...
& if the name Andy Savage sounds familiar, there's a reason - the lawyer representing Dylann Roof’s victims is also representing the cop who shot Walter Scott.
Is Dylann Roof one of the 'mass shooters' you would identify as mentally ill? Or, has he been easily influenced by bad agendas? If 'easily influenced' which agenda are you specifically referencing here?
I have no idea if he is or isn't. I'm not a psychologist.
Regardless of why I want him to get juiced. I think they found him technically sane which means there's less red tape in giving a death penalty verdict. I just hope it gets done before the progressives abolish the death penalty.
Well show me white cops giving an African American a hamburger fries and drink after they' murdered 9 innocent white Caucasian inside their church building.
And I will believe your twisted logic abour everything that you just said.
It sounds like you're heavily speculating to prove some sort of nonexsitant conspiracy theory.
If the cops were on Roof's side wouldn't they just let him go? Or "not find" him?
Cops are more afraid of lawyers than anything. They most likely were playing by the book given the high profile the case was.
Anyways, Dylan Roof is not mentally ill. Yall so scared to just call this person evil. He knew what he was doing. He knew how to plot and plan what he was doing. And using mental illness is an attempt by white american to distance themselves from their own violence-producing culture. There's no way all your murderers just happen to be mentally ill. Claim that. Own that. Admit that your own problems exist. Admit that there is something about white american culture that creates this mass shooters more than other groups.
And you are an expert?, he could very well be mentally ill, but that does not mean he didn't know what he was doing. In my opinion, anyone who does this type of act has something wrong mentally, normal people don't do these types of things.
Roof is toast and will hopefully be put to death. If he doesn't deserve the death penalty for slaughtering innocent people, I don't know who does.
As to the cop Slager, if I remember correctly, he shot an unarmed guy in the back multiple times who was running away.
Unless there is something bizarre that I am unaware of, this is a clear case of abuse of authority. My understanding is that the only time a LEO is justified in shooting a fleeing suspect is if he poses an immediate threat to the public (i.e. murderer, escaped felon, etc.).
I never heard that this guy met that criteria, so I have no clue why this cop shot him to death.
Therefore based on what I have read/heard, he should be convicted of at least some type of homicide, probably murder 2 at most, manslaughter at the least.
I imagine it's the same rules that go along with concealed weapons permits. I think it's a given you're not supposed to blast somebody when they're running from you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
