Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wait until Trump appoints his FBI director and Attorney General. It will be out of Trumps hands. The President has no say in Justice. Well, not like Obama did for his fellow crook.
I was much more concerned about just about every one of her policies and how our country could sustain her plan without falling under its own weight of mistakes in 4 years time.
"The e-mails mean NOTHING to me."
I am glad MORE people care about national security then you do.
Wait until Trump appoints his FBI director and Attorney General. It will be out of Trumps hands. The President has no say in Justice. Well, not like Obama did for his fellow crook.
She has been cleared ,twice,like it or not nothing can be done .
Actually Trump is going into settlement talks next few weeks which will get rid of this distraction. So much for that idea...
"SAN DIEGO — Donald Trump’s attorney told a federal judge Thursday he’s open to settlement talks in a class-action fraud lawsuit involving the president-elect and his now-defunct Trump University.
Attorney Daniel Petrocelli also asked during a hearing that the trial be delayed until early next year because Trump needs time to work on the transition to the presidency."
What is that supposed to mean, are you denying it? "By the time all the ballots are counted, she seems likely to be ahead by more than 2 million votes and more than 1.5 percentage points, according to my Times colleague Nate Cohn. She will have won by a wider percentage margin than not only Al Gore in 2000 but also Richard Nixon in 1968 and John F. Kennedy in 1960"http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/op...-win.html?_r=0
I am glad MORE people care about national security then you do.
They mean a bit more than nothing, the biggest thing was her lying in reference to them. It's not the offense but the coverup.
With that being said I'm more interested in the Clinton Foundation investigation and what's been going on there.
What is that supposed to mean, are you denying it? "By the time all the ballots are counted, she seems likely to be ahead by more than 2 million votes and more than 1.5 percentage points, according to my Times colleague Nate Cohn. She will have won by a wider percentage margin than not only Al Gore in 2000 but also Richard Nixon in 1968 and John F. Kennedy in 1960"http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/op...-win.html?_r=0
So, out of 232 Million possible voters you think a 2 million lead is some kind of mandate? Seriously?
So, out of 232 Million possible voters you think a 2 million lead is some kind of mandate? Seriously?
Sorry but it's just a teeny bit disingenuous to include people who didn't vote, dontcha think? And yes I think the popular vote matters and you would do if the tables were turned, you just don't want to admit that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.