So how deep does the liberal conspiracy go?

[NxtGen]

Originally Posted by Astral_Weeks

I stopped reading here. Yikes. You are nuts...

You were educated in the public education system?

Or did you not know that Lincoln attacked another state which he had no constitutional authority to? (ie the Constitution only allows the federal government to defend a state from invading forces, not police it or attack it for not following its will)

Or maybe you would like to discuss how Lincoln was not given the authority by congress to declare war on the south (maybe you might know why that is?)

The reason this country is failing is because it is filled with ignorant people who have been indoctrinated by a corrupt system.

You go ahead and stop reading though, critical reading is not one of the strong points of our younger generations, actually... blind flowing is.

[NxtGen]

Originally Posted by Shankapotomus

So if Democrats and the Clinton's can influence a republican FBI director, how come they didn't just use their influence and power to squash talk and questions of the Benghazi emails at all?

The whole idea of cover up doesn't even make sense.

The Clinton's control all these agencies in the government, elections, the Press but they can't keep Hillary from being brought in front of an investigation committee for eleven hours before her presidential run???

/sigh

so because they don't control everything at every moment, it is evidence that they have no control at all?

Do you know what the "extremism fallacy" is? Oh wait.. you must, because you just used it.

[Magritte25]

Originally Posted by Astral_Weeks

If the suit fits...but as I noted this style has been present on the left as well as any reading of the original essay will tell you. It just so happens it is most dominate on the right in 2016. Ralph Nader is pretty good at it too.

One simple question: do you believe Obama was born in Hawaii?

Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease

I have no idea where he was born. Could care less.

Well you should know and you should care considering it was a huge source of contention and division during our president's tenure.

Or are you just deflecting?

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by Shankapotomus

This GOP's love affair with accusations of "bias" and "conspiracy" go way back.

First, when they defeated Reoublicans in elections, it was just the Democrats colluding amongst themselves.

Then, when they reported certain facts that were unfavorable to Republican's, the Press was in on the conspiracy.

Now, because a decision didn't go their way, it's the FBI.

Anybody seeing a theme here?

"This GOP's love affair with accusations of "bias" and "conspiracy" go way back."

You need to look at the other lane once in a while.

It is just as correct to say, "This DEM's love affair with accusations of "bias" and "conspiracy" go way back."

Are you old enough to remember 1989 and John Tower, "Where do I go to get MY reputation back"? after the dems tried to destroy him?

The dem Senate DENIED his Cabinet appointment.

Wait, aren't the dems now crying about "the President's appointments should not be blocked"?

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by Astral_Weeks

If the suit fits...but as I noted this style has been present on the left as well as any reading of the original essay will tell you. It just so happens it is most dominate on the right in 2016. Ralph Nader is pretty good at it too.

One simple question: do you believe Obama was born in Hawaii?

Do you believe W. Bush blew up the levees in New Orleans?

These threads are FULL of "conspiracy" from BOTH sides.

I don't think one side has more less then the other.

Only a totally biased person would think otherwise.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by NxtGen

Looks like someone read Saul Alinksy's work. Not a surprise as Hillary was good friends with him.