Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh, please. Blacks call each other ****** in public frequently, and you know it.
Not what I'm talking about and you know it . Have the courage to answer my questions about FOX News, or slink away and pretend you didn't see them if that's how you operate .
Last edited by wallflash; 11-11-2016 at 09:23 AM..
The Dems fielded the candidate who won their primaries/caucuses, and therefore the nomination. Seems the problem is the Dem voters, themselves.
It is . They hyper focused on social issues and took the union guys for granted . Which is why it won't be hard for them to win them back with a Sanders type leader . They didn't switch to the GOP, so they don't have to coax them back away from the GOP, just pay attention to their concerns these next four years and field a better candidate .
First step might be to abandon the super delegate concept .
-for every dem who crossed party lines, a previous GOP voter stayed home. a net 0.
GOP votes have been flat for 3 straight presidential elections.
Actually, in the last 3 elections the GOP vote was down from Bush's 04 tally of 62M. 08 was 59M and both 12 and 16 were 60M.
But this is new territory. The GOP will control the whole thing and the turnout in 2020 may surprise us all.
A large GOP turnout in 2020 will happen only if the Trump administration delivers what we all need.
This is hilarious. As though Donald Trump isn't cozy with Wall Street.
Also: "lame stream media." Still quoting that idiot Sarah Palin? Really?
Trump is as cozy with Wall Street as I am. I own stock and use a bank. He's as cozy with Wall Street as someone who buys tacos from a taco stand. Hillary was owned by Wall Street.
You know you're right about the other comment though. Its down to a trickle.
It is . They hyper focused on social issues and took the union guys for granted . Which is why it won't be hard for them to win them back with a Sanders type leader .
Oh, I doubt that. The union guys don't want their pockets picked to pay for all the freebies Bernie is promising to others.
So you lack the courage to answer my questions and dodge instead .Just as expected.
I doubt you can link to Sharpton, Jackson , any black news personality , etc etc, talking about the nlggers. What a few do between themselves in their daily lives is not my concern .
I reclarified my words for your benefit , and asked for a response from you . I highly doubt you will have the courage to stop playing your game and answer , but we will see .
Last edited by wallflash; 11-11-2016 at 10:36 AM..
So you lack the courage to answer my questions and dodge instead .Just as expected.
What do your questions have to do with you specifically stating that the use of racial epithets in public "shows the progression of liberal concepts?" Nothing.
You, in your own words:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash
Really? Hear anyone calling black people n1ggers in public lately?
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
Just other Blacks. Is that a problem?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash
Not at all. But it shows the progression of liberal concepts , which was my point .
Explain why you believe there's "no problem at all" with Blacks using racial epithets in public, and how doing so "shows the progression of liberal concepts."
What do your questions have to do with you specifically stating that the use of racial epithets in public "shows the progression of liberal concepts?" Nothing.
You, in your own words:
Explain why you believe there's "no problem at all" with Blacks using racial epithets in public, and how doing so "shows the progression of liberal concepts."
When you can answer my questions on FOX News anchors using the term nlgger then I will answer yours . But it's a two way street . Don't dodge mine because you are afraid to answer and then demand more answers from me . Grow up, put your big boy pants on , tighten the belt if they might fall off, and answer my questions. Then I will gladly answer yours and we can engage in a discussion in an adult manner .
But I will answer this much in the hopes that you will find the courage to answer mine . Your answer that you had heard " just the blacks" shows that whites have learned it isn't acceptable . THATS why I said it shows progress . Because you DONT hear it from whites anymore .
Now, get your big boy pants on and answer mine . I answered you .
When you can answer my questions on FOX News anchors using the term nlgger then I will answer yours .
Ask them. I'm not the one saying the use of racial epithets in public "shows the progression of liberal concepts." YOU are:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash
Really? Hear anyone calling black people n1ggers in public lately?
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
Just other Blacks. Is that a problem?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallflash
Not at all. But it shows the progression of liberal concepts , which was my point .
Explain why YOU believe there's "no problem at all" with Blacks using racial epithets in public, and how doing so "shows the progression of liberal concepts."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Blacks call each other ****** in public frequently, and you know it.
