Sanctuary Cities What Ought Trump Do? (activist, racism, independent, dollar)

[marino760]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

You are free to disagree, but clearly you are not understanding the problem with the new/added costs, and who should pay for it.

The cost has always been there. Nothing has changed. They have always been paid with existing tax dollars although you don't like that fact. It was there 20 years ago and will be there tomorrow. There are no new costs. This is not a new program. We pay taxes on every level.
You can't choose not to pay for schools because you don't like them or don't have children in the school district.

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

If San Diego can afford the extra cost, then that's their choice.

CA is pretty much a sanctuary State.

[doodlemagic]

im sympathetic to illegals but at the same time this country is not a charity nor is it fair people who break the rules benefit over people who follow the rules.

imagine if we had sanctuary cities for drug users or other people who break the laugh. people would laugh at that so why is immigration laws any different?

[e30is]

Originally Posted by 18Montclair

They are home.


The overwhelming majority of them do-deport the ones who dont. I totally agree.


Yes we alllllll need to work on that.


No, it was other Americans who decided to hire them, educate them, give them health care, etc.

I FULLY SUPPORT THAT.

Everyone already here that isnt a criminal should be given a path to permanent legal status, ultimately citizenship.

Why should we be punished for having a charitable hearts because that's our reaction to the federal govt being incapable of securing the border?


And it's our duty to forgive their tresspass and help them.


Actually this is the height of hypocrisy:

And you're from a city that's being heavily gentrified. When did you folks care about what happens to illegals?

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer

Maybe some money could be diverted to have an ICE officer at the ready in larger Cities.

Sanctuary city policy gets funding yanked by federal government - Washington Times

The Senate blocked the bill, try to keep up Senate Democrats block bill to strip federal funds from 'sanctuary cities'

[marino760]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

The Senate blocked the bill, try to keep up Senate Democrats block bill to strip federal funds from 'sanctuary cities'

Yes, and that's what's changed. Dems are no longer able to block the bill and there is now a President that won't veto it.

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua

It would be "Harboring". Five year sentence.

Harboring if someone commits a crime after a law enforcement agency refused to honor an ICE Detainer?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Originally Posted by 2sleepy

The Senate blocked the bill, try to keep up Senate Democrats block bill to strip federal funds from 'sanctuary cities'

I said divert some, which doesn't mean "block" or "strip" all. I didn't know it needed spelled out. I'm suggesting moving around some funds to cover an ICE agents cost. Just one program alone that gives blanket status to schools for free meals. If a certain percentage qualify they just give status to the entire school. That is a huge waste. I'm sure it could be found somewhere.

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Originally Posted by e30is

And you're from a city that's being heavily gentrified. When did you folks care about what happens to illegals?

A lot of Cities didn't care until they got to share the pain. Now it's everywhere.

[jm1982]

This is how gentrification is being handled in LA

Turns out diversity isn't so cool if it's white People moving in.

More peace and love from the leftists ..

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...gentrification