Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2016, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
2,294 posts, read 2,661,720 times
Reputation: 3151

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
From the article...

Why won’t they work for Trump? “One person who met last month with Trump’s national security and homeland security transition team leader said that she confessed that many candidates had flatly rejected attempts to recruit them, believing that Trump was unfit to hold the office of commander-in-chief.”


So let me get this straight.

A candidate who has classified emails on all sorts of unapproved devices would be fit to hold the office of commander in chief. They would work for her....
How do you infer that from the quote you posted?

Maybe they thought Hillary was also unqualified. Hillary being unqualified has nothing to do with Trump's qualifications.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2016, 08:24 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,187,569 times
Reputation: 23892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knox Harrington View Post
How do you infer that from the quote you posted?

Maybe they thought Hillary was also unqualified. Hillary being unqualified has nothing to do with Trump's qualifications.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wombleywomberly View Post
Did they say that?

Or did they say they wouldn't work for the Trumpenführer because they think he's unfit to be C in C?

Not wanting to work for the Trumpenführer does not = wanting to work for the Hildebeast.

Is the Trumpzi answer to everything for the next 4 years going to be, "yeah, but HILLARY...?"
I believe they had a problem with Trump before he was elected.

They were aware of Clinton's problems... I did not hear any complaints.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
2,294 posts, read 2,661,720 times
Reputation: 3151
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I believe they had a problem with Trump before he was elected.

They were aware of Clinton's problems... I did not hear any complaints.
What?

From your own link:

Quote:
The letter acknowledges that many Americans "have doubts about Hillary Clinton, as do many of us."

Quote:
"People were in different places about whether they want to endorse Clinton and their doubts about her, but we settled on a statement that recognizes many people have concerns about Clinton," he said. "Some people will clearly endorse her, others will never endorse her, but everyone was united in their belief that Donald Trump is not qualified."
Your quote was:

Quote:
They would work for her

SOME of them MIGHT have worked for Clinton, but not all, and probably not most. What they did say, is that NONE of them would work for Trump.

The letter really has nothing to do with Clinton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 08:59 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,774,139 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
Trump said he would put the best people around him. Unfortunately, the best people don't want to be around him.

Nobody In National Security Wants to Work for Donald Trump
Trump is turning into a dictator. His Chief Advisor is a Neo-Nazi. Anyone who wants to have a career after this needs to stay far away from him. He's a monster, as are his supporters who put him there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 09:00 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,774,139 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
From the article...

Why won’t they work for Trump? “One person who met last month with Trump’s national security and homeland security transition team leader said that she confessed that many candidates had flatly rejected attempts to recruit them, believing that Trump was unfit to hold the office of commander-in-chief.”


So let me get this straight.

A candidate who has classified emails on all sorts of unapproved devices would be fit to hold the office of commander in chief. They would work for her....
Your new VP is having an email scandal of his own. Republicans are experts at hypocrisy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 09:02 PM
 
8,275 posts, read 7,947,458 times
Reputation: 12122
This source is kind of like when republicans link to WND. You realize that right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2016, 03:24 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,663,943 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Javacoffee View Post
Good. We don't need any of them.
Trump will find the best no matter where they are.
Ohhhhhh yeahhhhhh, like Omerosa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2016, 03:30 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,663,943 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Trump is turning into a dictator. His Chief Advisor is a Neo-Nazi. Anyone who wants to have a career after this needs to stay far away from him. He's a monster, as are his supporters who put him there.

Experts are saying if there was a revote held Trump would lose by a mile .People are that mad with his choices so far.
1) People he has chosen to work with him.

2)His disrespect for the position by not working in Washington and the White House itself.

3) Going back on promises made during the election.

4) things he has said since being elected.(surprise)



...........these are all thing people who did not vote for him knew,others are just finding out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2016, 03:35 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1.. View Post
Experts are saying if there was a revote held Trump would lose by a mile .People are that mad with his choices so far.
1) People he has chosen to work with him.

2)His disrespect for the position by not working in Washington and the White House itself.

3) Going back on promises made during the election.

4) things he has said since being elected.(surprise)



...........these are all thing people who did not vote for him knew,others are just finding out.
Experts? There are "experts" in this? What did they study to become "experts"? What is their expertise in exactly?

Or is it that you are just making crap up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2016, 03:40 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,663,943 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Experts? There are "experts" in this? What did they study to become "experts"? What is their expertise in exactly?

Or is it that you are just making crap up?

Nope ,they are EXPERTS in the field of "Political Studies".Yet the uneducated that voted for Trump would not understand such a thing existed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top