Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ah, so your choice to boycott his business because of your ideology , but if a baker makes his choice due to his ideology , that isn't okay. Hmm... I see some flawed logic going on there.
I didn't say I would boycott his business. Not at any point.
Times have changed i guess.
It demonstrates the public divisiveness the likes of Trump brings out.
How is he ever going to unite people?
The same can be said about Obama, Bush, and down the line. If Obama had owned hotels, people would have boycotted them too. The difference is the people boycotting would have been called racists.
Sad. I feel bad for them. This business is being punished for doing what it does to make a living. Serve food. Do we all have to ask a business if they agree with us politically before we engage in business with them?
That's what I'm wondering.
I usually don't know what an establishment owner's politics are before I do business with them, and I don't want to know. I don't care.
It'd be different if the owner was engaged in some kind of behavior I found immoral or unethical. THERE is a reason to not do business with them. But for catering an event for the son of a politician I disagree with? REALLY?
The same can be said about Obama, Bush, and down the line. If Obama had owned hotels, people would have boycotted them too. The difference is the people boycotting would have been called racists.
Yeah usually when masses of ignorant white people do something out of pure nastiness to a black person, it's called racism.
Yeah usually when masses of ignorant white people do something out of pure nastiness to a black person, it's called racism.
Rightly so.
So what is it called when masses of ignorant black people do something out of pure nastiness to a black person? Oh wait, black folks tend to ignore stuff when it's done to their own people. Which is why sham groups like BLM talk about police brutality all the time, but won't address gang violence (or even black on black crime for that matter).
White people boycott white business that support black issues all the time. Why is this even a story? And my opinion on the matter is their is a lot of extra context that goes beyond "blacks should just stick together no matter what". This is a great example of something that should be an internal issue for the black community but white people will stick their nose in it and muddy up the field for an issue that they really should stay out of. But both side on the issue have made peaceful choices and have gone their separate ways.
The only purpose of this thread is to basically made this some sort of diet form of "black on black" crime. It serves no other purpose that to make a black person who supports white supremacy be some kind of victim and being pro-black is supposed to be wrong. Yall need new ways to troll with this slick stuff. We see right through it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
