Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And David Axelrod, President Obama’s chief strategist, tweeted Thursday that the Trump campaign isn’t behind at all:
We hadn't made any major appointments at this point in 2008. I don't remember being criticized for it. https://t.co/3yXvA8g6bL
— David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) November 17, 2016
Quote:
For all of the yodelers in the media and on CD about the lack of speed of Trump's picks which to you and the media means chaos, Obama was elected November 4, 2008. Here's when he made his big picks. Remember anyone complaining about him dribbling them out and how it meant chaos? Remember anyone whining that he didn't make his cabinet picks quick enough? Yeah, me neither.
Announced November 6, 2008
Chief of Staff
Announced November 22, 2008
Press Secretary
Announced November 28, 2008
Secretary of The Treasury
Announced December 1, 2008:
Secretary of State
Attorney General
Secretary of Homeland Security
Secretary of Defense
US Ambassador to the UN
Announced December 7, 2008:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Announced December 13, 2008:
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Announced December 15, 2008:
Secretary of Energy
Administer of the EPA
Announced December 16, 2008:
Secretary of Education
Announced December 17, 2008:
Secretary of The Interior
Secretary of Agriculture
You may recall a problem with some being tax reported/paid handicapped like Geithner and all of the ones for Health and Human Services before Sebeilius.
The majority of his stated promises are completely unachievable. A good example is term limits for congress. Basically lots of promises. And the people he has been looking at for positions is a who's who of corruption, with a hefty dose of nepotism. He's probably just been told he cant hire his relatives, and is finding ways to put them into power without any obvious pay.
Seriously.....I want to give the guy a chance, but he keeps acting in ways that tell me that him being president will....present learning opportunities for us as a country.
If only you'd had the same scrutiny for the last guy, whom you voted for twice.
The majority of his stated promises are completely unachievable. A good example is term limits for congress. Basically lots of promises. And the people he has been looking at for positions is a who's who of corruption, with a hefty dose of nepotism. He's probably just been told he cant hire his relatives, and is finding ways to put them into power without any obvious pay.
Seriously.....I want to give the guy a chance, but he keeps acting in ways that tell me that him being president will....present learning opportunities for us as a country.
Maybe people on the left will learn to not jump to conclusions based on nothing. Maybe rioters will learn that damaging people's property won't gain them any support. Maybe people will learn to not cry and have panic attacks over an election.
its ashame, I agree about 'draining the swamp' Ive been saying it for decades.we have a government that is loyal only to corporate interests.this is why I dont vote never have and never will.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
