Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He was saying you can't support your assertion that liberals would defend Obama if became CEO of a company that was dumping toxic waste. The truth is that his stature among liberals would be greatly diminished if he did that.
Too much hyperbole, the EPA sets standards for clean air and water he wants to role them back.
Those regulation need to be within the scope of the law. What will be rolled back is burdensome and sometimes pointless laws. One thing I do expect is for them to cancel the proposed CO2 regulations currently making their way through the courts and an amendment of the Clean Air Act stripping the EPA from ever unilaterally implementing those laws without Congress. They are doing this under a 1990 law never intended to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.
I love this phrase because it is hard to drain a swamp when he is packing it full of alligators. Seriously, do you think he is really gonna drain the swamp with the help of billionaires, DC insiders, and Wall Street insiders? No, he is gonna cook the system to benefit him and his friends by making the swamp thicker.
...and he's not a serious candidate, he'll never win the Republican Party nomination, and he won't beat Hilary, blah, blah, blah
Too much hyperbole, the EPA sets standards for clean air and water he wants to role them back. Take a look around, is there an over abundance of clean air and water, make your case that we have gone to far in that direction.
Watch the video I posted, some of the EPA regs are choking businesses and need to be more reasonable. Take note in the video where he says the EPA is forcing them to remove so called "pollutants" that already exist in water before they even use it, ridiculous.
He was saying you can't support your assertion that liberals would defend Obama if became CEO of a company that was dumping toxic waste. The truth is that his stature among liberals would be greatly diminished if he did that.
They constantly defend his incredibly huge optional carbon footprint with ridiculous excuses all the time.
Yea, we all hate clean air and water. I got some news for you, rhetoric like this is one of the reasons your team is sitting on the bench. Environmental laws are important but they also need to be practical. The analogy I like to use here is we can build a car that is going to survivable in almost any crash, that is pointless if no one can afford the car and for those that can it's useless for everyday life.
Well I'm to kill to kill some puppies...
Also, government regulations account for 30%+ of the price of a car.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
