Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:27 PM
 
10,225 posts, read 7,580,886 times
Reputation: 23161

Advertisements

Wow. This is historical. Clinton's popular vote lead has increased to 1.5 Million votes.

How likely is it that almost all polls for months were that wrong? Anyone know the gambling odds of that? It's historical for all those polls to have been so wrong for so long, as far as I know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:30 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,958,731 times
Reputation: 6059
In what way were the national polls wrong? Several polls were spot on like IBD and LA Times and others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:33 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,607,699 times
Reputation: 22232
Luckily, the witch won't be occupying the WH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:34 PM
 
10,225 posts, read 7,580,886 times
Reputation: 23161
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
In what way were the national polls wrong? Several polls were spot on like IBD and LA Times and others.
Only a couple of times. There were numerous highly rated polls, which had HRC ahead for many months. The only change was how much she was ahead.

IBD and the LA Times had Trump ahead just a few times. LA Times isn't a highly rated poll because of its methodology.

Fivethirtyeight.com, which runs algorythms based on polls, gambling odds, and historical results, had HRC ahead consistently through much of the year, as well. That is computer based. The head guy even decreased her odds of winning for a couple of human reasons...but she was still very much ahead in odds of winning....always.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:35 PM
 
5,722 posts, read 5,798,945 times
Reputation: 4381
Too bad, get over it. People in 3 cities don't get to decide for the rest of the country. Once you factor in the illegal alien votes it's probably about even, or Trump won the popular vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:35 PM
 
Location: N Atlanta
4,584 posts, read 4,195,672 times
Reputation: 2323
Quote:
Originally Posted by bpollen View Post
Wow. This is historical. Clinton's popular vote lead has increased to 1.5 Million votes.

How likely is it that almost all polls for months were that wrong? Anyone know the gambling odds of that? It's historical for all those polls to have been so wrong for so long, as far as I know.
How many illegals voted in California ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:36 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,343 posts, read 16,699,701 times
Reputation: 13358
Congrats to Clinton and still a loser....BAAHAHAHA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:37 PM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,884,494 times
Reputation: 2460
Quote:
Originally Posted by bpollen View Post
Wow. This is historical. Clinton's popular vote lead has increased to 1.5 Million votes.

How likely is it that almost all polls for months were that wrong? Anyone know the gambling odds of that? It's historical for all those polls to have been so wrong for so long, as far as I know.
Of course you counting the Snowflakes who did not vote?


This is why we have he electoral College so these "Snow flakes" do not make decisions for the rest of the country!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:40 PM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,792,682 times
Reputation: 5821
Trump could have done better in the popular vote but he had to concentrate on states he had to win: FL, OH, PA, NC. He had to go to them again and again. He could have picked up a lot more votes in CA, NY but not enough to win them. So why campaign there? He didn't have the $$$ Clinton did, his own party wasn't supporting him. He was his only campaigner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2016, 12:46 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,832,973 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by bpollen View Post
Wow. This is historical. Clinton's popular vote lead has increased to 1.5 Million votes.

How likely is it that almost all polls for months were that wrong? Anyone know the gambling odds of that? It's historical for all those polls to have been so wrong for so long, as far as I know.
who cares about the national popular vote? it means nothing in the grand scheme of things. its the STATE popular vote that counts, and trump won enough state popular votes to win the national election.

as for the polls, they were weighted from 2012 when democrat turnout was large, thus they didnt show what was really going on in the country, and that was the demcorats had no energy in their campaign, where as republicans did have energy.

when trump went out for rallies, HE drew large crowds by himself, where as clinton needed hollywood stars to draw the people out to her rallies, and usually by the time the stars were done, and clinton took the stage, many in the crowd had left.

clinton was always going to win the national popular vote, especially when states like new york and california were going to clinton big time, that was a given. but trump won the states that were needed to win the election, ohio, wisconsin, michigan, and pennsylvania. states that went for obama in 2012, and were thought to be in clintons pocket so she essentially ignored those states, were as trump went and talked to the people a number of times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top