Ron Paul reveals list of fake journalists

[Three Wolves In Snow]

Originally Posted by Natural510

It's like they haven't even taken English 101 at a community college to understand the concept of verifiable sources, or something...

That's pretty rich coming from a bunch of people who didn't even verify if this was written by Ron Paul or not.

Because it wasn't. It was written by Chris Rossini.

And the emails from WikiLeaks showed that those people were, indeed, collaborating with the Clinton regime..er, camp.

[OotsaPootsa]

Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow

That's pretty rich coming from a bunch of people who didn't even verify if this was written by Ron Paul or not. Because it wasn't. It was written by Chris Rossini.

Did someone say it was written by Ron Paul?

[Vacanegro]

Originally Posted by wall st kid

The difference between CNN and Alex Jones for example, is that Alex Jones doesn't have someone higher up than him telling him what to say, with the 'daily news' and 'cnn' they have 'bosses' who tell these hacks what to write, jones and other independent journalists are giving you THEIR opinion, its not the opinion of their bosses. Jones has credibility due to the information, if he was posting 'fake' news, no way he would be as popular, smart people know how to weed out lies.

Apparently not.

Hillary Clinton correct that Austin's Alex Jones said no one died at Sandy Hook Elementary | PolitiFact Texas

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...fcd_story.html


I suppose the Holocaust was faked too ? So much for credibility.

Personally, anyone who attacks parents of murdered children as liars or plants will NEVER have even a ounce of credibility.