Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-21-2016, 07:24 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has invested up to $1 million in the energy assets company behind the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline, according to financial records he was required to disclose prior to running for office.
Donald Trump Invested Company Behind Controversial Dakota Access Pipeline, Records Show - ABC News


And the plot thickens...this is going to provide so much fodder as this pipeline issue becomes more and more dramatic. I am totally on the side of these native people and it will not look good for a POTUS if this gets ugly and he is financially invested in the outcome.
I'll bet he has invested money in a lot of possible ventures he thought might be profitable. So freaking what?

Is it illegal to make investments as a private citizen? Quick, toss Trump in prison, he made an investment as a private businessman.

Tinfoil hat time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2016, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has invested up to $1 million in the energy assets company behind the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline, according to financial records he was required to disclose prior to running for office.
Donald Trump Invested Company Behind Controversial Dakota Access Pipeline, Records Show - ABC News


And the plot thickens...this is going to provide so much fodder as this pipeline issue becomes more and more dramatic. I am totally on the side of these native people and it will not look good for a POTUS if this gets ugly and he is financially invested in the outcome.
+1

Stay classy Donny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2016, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
Are you the president-elect? Will you have the potential to craft legislation and change environmental protection regulations?
He invested over a year ago, maybe more, you act like he just invest ten minutes ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2016, 07:27 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
Are you the president-elect? Will you have the potential to craft legislation and change environmental protection regulations?
I was unaware that President-elects, or even Presidents, waived their rights to invest for their future. Does this selective made up "rule" extend to Secretary of States?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2016, 07:27 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
Are you the president-elect? Will you have the potential to craft legislation and change environmental protection regulations?
He makes a valid point. The zero rates has forced many into things like energy stocks. No, they do not have to but that's just how it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2016, 07:27 PM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,730,662 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
Are you the president-elect? Will you have the potential to craft legislation and change environmental protection regulations?
You mean like Senator Harry Reid who buys up worthless land in Nevada and then earmarks spending bills that causes his parcels to increase in value?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2016, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
+1

Stay classy Donny.
Why don't all you guys sport tinfoil hats, so we can easily tell who on this forums we need to write off as fringe conspiracy kooks?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2016, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
You mean like Senator Harry Reid who buys up worthless land in Nevada and then earmarks spending bills that causes his parcels to increase in value?
While he is a sitting senator, no less. It's how all these crooks get filthy rich while collecting a senator's salary.

Pelosi and Fienstien have done far worse, as sitting members of the US Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,295 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
The decision regarding the pipeline will more than likely end up with Trump, this will not help the decision. Just one of many conflicts of interest that will come up, but the president can't be held responsible.


Quote:
President-elect Donald Trump holds stock in the company building the disputed Dakota Access oil pipeline, and opponents of the project warn those investments could affect any decision he makes on the $3.8bn project as president.
Trump's 2016 federal disclosure forms show he owned between $15,000 and $50,000 in stock in Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners.
That's down from between $500,000 and $1m a year earlier.
Trump also owns between $100,000 and $250,000 in Phillips 66, which has a one-quarter share of Dakota Access.
Trump's stock in Dakota Access pipeline raises concerns - News from Al Jazeera
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2016, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,265,578 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
He invested over a year ago, maybe more, you act like he just invest ten minutes ago.
Irrelevant when he invested--if he still owns, that's a problem--bigly.

What is it you don't get about conflict of interests?

This is what is going to trip him up, violate the Constitution and get him impeached, if he does not liquidate. Emoluments Clause.

"...At the time of his most recent disclosure statement in May, Trump owned $100,000 to $250,000 of stock in Phillips 66, which has a 25 percent stake in the Dakota Access project..."

Donald Trump officially backs Dakota pipeline, says it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top