Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Constitutionally and legally, they aren't. Now if the Fed Gov would actually uphold the Constitution and their own laws, there never would have been any rogue "policy" illegally making them so.
What future are you talking about. Do you want to do the grunt work that these people do. What americans would do this work. We would be screwed without their hard word. You are the foolish one.
LOL at liberals' totally fake "grunt work" meme. You need to read this thread in the Illegal Immigration forum:
Mayra Machado, a serial criminal, is an illegal alien who had a well-paying job as an ophthalmology assistant and drove a BMW until a routine traffic stop snagged her. The more one looks into her story to see how any of that even happened, the more one sees the additional crimes she's committed.
His language doesn't appear to be in the text of the 14th. Does it?
It's in the Congressional Globe, the official U.S. publication that documents the Congressional discussion of and therefore the intent of the 14th Amendment when it was proposed and passed. westcoastforme is correct.
What future are you talking about. Do you want to do the grunt work that these people do. What americans would do this work. We would be screwed without their hard word. You are the foolish one.
So employers would need to pay more AND learn to treat their workers better, do you have a problem with that? I don't.
What is the case in most countries in the world? If a woman gives birth in Japan, Switzerland, Russia or Mexico, does the newborn become instantly a citizen? Why can't the US for once do the same?
Only Mexico will grant citizenship based jus soli. The other countries follow jus sanguinis
Constitutionally and legally, they do not. Look up the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. U.S.-born Native Americans were subject to their own Tribes' sovereignties and were not birthright U.S. citizens until an exception was made for them via Federal Statute in 1924. That is still the ONLY existing exception to the "subject to the jurisdiction" requirement to this day.
Read the law. If everyone born in the U.S. were automatically a U.S. citizen, subsection (b) would neither be included nor necessary.
That's because Indians were not subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Again, were going right back to what I said. If you are subject to the sovereignty of the US, which Indians and those with diplomatic immunity are not, then whomever is born here is a US citizen by birth. The Indian Citizenship Act was necessary because Indians are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, because of tribal sovereignty.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The more one looks into her story to see how any of that even happened, the more one sees the additional crimes she's committed.
?