Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes bc let's deport kids with a citation for skateboarding in the park after hours.
They are here illegally to begin with, frankly I think they should be deported regardless. Here's a tip, if you are already breaking one law it's probably not a good idea to bring attention to yourself by breaking other laws.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
IF such a bill had a ghost of a chance of passing the House & Senate -- THEN Obama would not have written an "Executive Memo" in the first place. This is going nowhere and both Graham & Durbin know it.
Add to that - both of these men are Attorneys. I would expect that they are aware that DACA/DAPA has a Court Order against the program and that they must be aware that the Supreme Court kicked the case back down to the Texas Court that issued the injunction against DACA/DAPA.
TeamObama lost this case in June 2016.
They are here illegally to begin with, frankly I think they should be deported regardless. Here's a tip, if you are already breaking one law it's probably not a good idea to bring attention to yourself by breaking other laws.
Lol... so why even bother w/ that "no run-ins" nonsense. You obviously don't believe that. Just come out and say "deport them all." Be honest w/ yourself and stop trying to seem like you're open to some middle-ground in this discussion. What's next... "Let's not deport good students, and by good, I mean 99% on the SAT."
They are here illegally to begin with, frankly I think they should be deported regardless. Here's a tip, if you are already breaking one law it's probably not a good idea to bring attention to yourself by breaking other laws.
We need tough laws so this is not repeated. What does this say to all the legal immigrants who came here lawfully?
Oh, so you are saying this is an anchor-child bill.
Yeah, it's still some sticky politics. Not going to be very good camera ops to see whole families being put on busses back to Mexico.
Seal the border first. Start taxing wires back second. Then see where we are at.
It doesn't apply to Americans which is the definition of anchor-child. I do agree that taxing remittances would be a good thing. If the entire family came here illegally it is only just and fair all of them are removed. If blame is to be assigned it is directly at the adults doing the deed.
IMO the bad camera op is the one of them sneaking across the border to begin with.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We need tough laws so this is not repeated. What does this say to all the legal immigrants who came here lawfully?
