Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Haven't had time to research all on the OP's list.
I also subscribe to the younger is better, ONLY for the sake of obviously longer terms. Of course there is much to be said for experience as well.
#1, Keith Blackwell
#9, Joan Larsen
#16, Amul Thapar
#18, David Stras
Of the four, Amul Thapar is the only one that has no experience as a Supreme Court Justice at the state level. But his history shows a penchant toward the application of stern sentencing and decision making, after deliberation.
Haven't had time to research all on the OP's list.
I also subscribe to the younger is better, ONLY for the sake of obviously longer terms. Of course there is much to be said for experience as well.
#1, Keith Blackwell
#9, Joan Larsen
#16, Amul Thapar
#18, David Stras
Of the four, Amul Thapar is the only one that has no experience as a Supreme Court Justice at the state level. But his history shows a penchant toward the application of stern sentencing and decision making, after deliberation.
CN
Is Amul Thapar an Originalist though? That seems to be the main ideological consideration for Scalia's seat.
Stras is the youngest candidate on this list, but he's a large man, so that may worry some people if they take into consideration the health of the candidates.
I don't think anyone really cares considering what we'd be looking at had Hillary been the one making the nominations.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.