Should TIME have name Hillary Clinton Person of the Year for Winning Popular Vote? (Congress, middle east)

[WaldoKitty]

Hillary won vote in California by wide margin. A state where neither candidate campaigned.

Her supporters say she is real winner because she won popular vote.

So should TIME have named Hillary, Person of the Year because she beat Trump with popular vote?

[Milton Miteybad]

No, of course not.

[WaldoKitty]

Numerous topics have been created on CD that suggest Hillary was the real winner because she won more votes than Trump.

[Frank DeForrest]

Not for that, but for her candidacy revealing the MSM for the liars they are, maybe.

[AADAD]

That's really absurd. Facing indictment, bankrolling the middle east for her own gain, lying to congress and the FBI. Trump did none of those things....

I think she must be some kind of mother figure.

[FinsterRufus]

Originally Posted by WaldoKitty

Numerous topics have been created on CD that suggest Hillary was the real winner because she won more votes than Trump.

She lost, get over it.

Your obsession with Hillary speaks for itself.

[WaldoKitty]

Originally Posted by FinsterRufus

She lost, get over it.

Your obsession with Hillary speaks for itself.

I raise issue because so many of you keep telling us how she won the popular vote.

[pknopp]

Let it go already.

[golgi1]

Originally Posted by WaldoKitty

Hillary won vote in California by wide margin. A state where neither candidate campaigned.

Her supporters say she is real winner because she won popular vote.

So should TIME have named Hillary, Person of the Year because she beat Trump with popular vote?

Should Clinton be named Person of the Year for winning a contest that we weren't having?

Will the Olympics give out gold medals for the most-liked athlete in 2020 (perhaps asking only the people from the largest cities)?

The answer is likely the same for both situations.

[Listener2307]

Originally Posted by FinsterRufus

She lost, get over it.

Your obsession with Hillary speaks for itself.

I don't think it speaks for itself at all.

Waldo's beating of Hillary is understandable. Terrified crime victims who narrowly overcame their assailant have been know to continue beating the perpetrator long after his death has halted the crime.
It's sort of the same thing. We know she's dead. But we have lived in terror of her being president for so long that we simply cannot bring ourselves to believe that she is gone.

We want to see the body.