Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:15 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6033

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by njquestions View Post
You had better tell the census, as well as City Data, which actually lists percentages.
the census is self reported, as long as their are closeted people, the census will never get the actual number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:17 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 820,477 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
the census is self reported, as long as their are closeted people, the census will never get the actual number.
That's a pretty nifty way of being able to claim homosexuals are any percentage of the population you want. Using that logic, I could even claim they were 95% of the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:26 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6033
Quote:
Originally Posted by njquestions View Post
That's a pretty nifty way of being able to claim homosexuals are any percentage of the population you want. Using that logic, I could even claim they were 95% of the population.
Put the partisan swords down for one second and ust have a discussion.

Im sure you know that all gay people are not out of the closet and in being so, do not identify on any paper work that they are gay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:28 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
The percentage really doesn't matter. 2%, 8%, 12% that does not change the discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:30 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 820,477 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Put the partisan swords down for one second and ust have a discussion.

Im sure you know that all gay people are not out of the closet and in being so, do not identify on any paper work that they are gay.
Sure, if you want to just have a discussion, then you should probably agree that citing any number that you have, by definition, claimed to be inaccurate should never be done. Therefore, nobody can or will ever be able to cite any number for percentage of homosexuals in the population, since it will always be inaccurate. And we don't want to use inaccurate numbers, do we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:34 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6033
Quote:
Originally Posted by njquestions View Post
Sure, if you want to just have a discussion, then you should probably agree that citing any number that you have, by definition, claimed to be inaccurate should never be done. Therefore, nobody can or will ever be able to cite any number for percentage of homosexuals in the population, since it will always be inaccurate. And we don't want to use inaccurate numbers, do we?
My argument isnt about whether it should be done or not, but rather that you seemed to be arguing that it couldnt be higher than the census reporting.

cite what ever number you want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:38 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,508,893 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldwine View Post
A part of me is wondering how many of the posters in this thread (and by extension, on this board) fit the "repressed single teenage male" demo.

The other part of me is wondering if they realize that they are being told to react a certain way to imaginary news. Do they know they are being used for the purposes of another?

Someone who really believes that gay people are "bullying Christians", a phrase so abstract that it specifies neither time nor place, really fits in well with the conservative mindset. Reality, facts, observation, and evidence have no place with them.

Finally, to "whiff" on something is to catch a scent. Did the OP mean "waffle"? Liberal gays-- as opposed to conservative gays?-- are failing to bullying Christians?

I know that the large portion of people here live in some small town in the middle of nowhere. Do yourselves a favor, get to civilization and talk to people. Experience first hand life and reality outside of the Fox News bubble.

Or, you know... Is there something else you'd like to tell us? Something we probably already know, but would make you feel so much better if you were to be true to yourself?
The article was written by a lesbian, Tammy Bruce. I guess she knows what she wanted to write on the subject. Here are some other articles she had written---
http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/tammy-bruce/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:45 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 820,477 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
My argument isnt about whether it should be done or not, but rather that you seemed to be arguing that it couldnt be higher than the census reporting.
Sure, and similarly, it could be lower than the census reporting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 11:46 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,633,814 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tominftl View Post
Why can't we live and let live?
That will never happen as long as Christians continue to insist that all gay sex is a hell of a lot worse sin than straight sex sin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 11:54 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,633,814 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
Being gay doesn't mean you get to have everything your way even if it destroys the religious freedoms of others. It's just downright disgusting that the bakery in Oregon lost everything because some gay couple was outraged that a business owner dare oppose SSM.
What was the problem? Did God warn the bakery owners He would punish them severely for selling a cake for a same sex wedding?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top