Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I know and have explained why it is NOT an evolutionary dead end. I have asked you SEVERAL times why you think it IS one. But you have dodged, run away and ignored the requests. And I suspect I know why. I could link you to my post where I first asked you if you like. A post you simply ignored and ran away from. It is one of many. You know it. I know it. And I somewhat suspect just about every reader of this thread knows it. You simply made a scientific claim that you have NO WAY of backing up. Again.
No. I'm not sure where you are reading this into what I said.
I was attempting to illustrate that, even with a perceived deficit, say, if the white, straight guy wasn't particularly fit...he would STILL have the advantage over a fit, brown, gay man in the court of public opinion (and in that of many hiring managers).
I know SOOO many fit, white, gay men. Of course I do.
I know plenty of fit, white, straight men, too.
Don't be so sure of that. There's a definite bias against overweight people in hiring.
That's probably what you think you did, but just as with your last argument, that wasn't the case.
See what I mean? You simply can not back up the claim you made. Guess what? I have a prediction. Your NEXT post to me will ALSO dodge giving any scientific evidence to back up the scientific claim you made. Whereas I can, and many times HAVE, explained on this forum why the claim you make is wrong. I can do it again. You cant. And guess what else? I have a question that I can ask you that you simply will not be able to answer with your "thinking" on the issue too.
See what I mean? You simply can not back up the claim you made. Guess what? I have a prediction. Your NEXT post to me will ALSO dodge giving any scientific evidence to back up the scientific claim you made. Whereas I can, and many times HAVE, explained on this forum why the claim you make is wrong. I can do it again. You cant. And guess what else? I have a question that I can ask you that you simply will not be able to answer with your "thinking" on the issue too.
That's a lot of words to say that you don't understand why homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end.
That's a lot of words to say that you don't understand why homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end.
Well thank you for proving my prediction right at least.
Guess what my next prediction is? Your next post will ALSO dodge giving any arguments or evidence that supports your claim that " homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end".
And the prediction comes true again. You still have not argued for, or backed up, your claim. At all. Even a little bit. YOU claimed homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end but YOU can not substantiate that claim. And it is quite comical to watch you squirm knowing as well as I do that you can not.
Guess what? The NEXT post from you is not going to have any evidence for the claim either. Watch..... here it comes.... will I get three for three..... you know I will....
BTW, I put you on ignore, which is sort of like if I late term aborted you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
