Gay liberals whiff on trying to bully Christians (speech, federal, religion)

[njquestions]

Oddly, the Second Amendment is actually written into the Constitution and is constantly infringed on, whereas gay marriage isn't anywhere in it, yet is "found" by liberals. Odd, huh?

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

That makes no sense. If you can't find anyone to agree with your cause, you still have the right to peacefully assemble, no?

Yes, you have to right to peacefully assemble. You do not have a right for people to agree with you. I'm missing your point and by quoting only half of what I said, I think you missed mine.

[njquestions]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

That makes no sense. If you can't find anyone to agree with your cause, you still have the right to peacefully assemble, no?

...unless it's near an abortion clinic.

[hooligan]

Originally Posted by pknopp

No, that is not logic. They can go at any time they want to the local Wal Mart and buy a gun.

And if there weren't the rights of TWO people involved, your statement could possibly be true.


Marriage can be a right and you still not be able to find someone willing to marry you - it's not mutually exclusive. C'mon, man, think a little....

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by njquestions

You could leave the decision of Constitutional issues up to even little kids, their decisions have as much Constitutional grounding as liberal judges of the SCOTUS...

Hamilton, Madison and folks like that would emphatically disagree with that opinion, but what did they know?

[kevxu]

Originally Posted by njquestions

It's always interesting how people cite the Supreme Court while abandoning logic and reason, almost as if that's some sort of fallacy ...

Really! It's not like they whipped together the Nicene creed or something like that.

[njquestions]

Originally Posted by hooligan

Marriage can be a right and you still not be able to find someone willing to marry you - it's not mutually exclusive. C'mon, man, think a little....

Except marriage can't be a right because it was a tradition that was artificially constructed by society.

[njquestions]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

Hamilton, Madison and folks like that would emphatically disagree with that opinion, but what did they know?

Pretty sure Hamilton, Madison, and folks like that would bust out laughing if they saw what liberals were doing today in their name. Then they'd probably start killing them for soiling their good names.

[hooligan]

Originally Posted by njquestions

Except marriage can't be a right because it was a tradition that was artificially constructed by society.

Where is that an exclusion to being a right?


Free speech isn't an artificial construct of society?


Religion is absolutely a societal construct and it's protected as a right.

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by hooligan

And if there weren't the rights of TWO people involved, your statement could possibly be true.


Marriage can be a right and you still not be able to find someone willing to marry you - it's not mutually exclusive. C'mon, man, think a little....

I have.