Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Don't be. I'm more upset about Bernie. Love that guy.
Now about the actual post??? OH I SEE. You're being dismissive and insulting because you assuming a motivation of writing that doesn't exist. Silly pirate. Kiss kiss.
No, they don't. Read the Constitution, the federal government has no powers or responsibilities except those specifically enumerated in the Constitution. Everything else is delegated to the states as each sees fit via the 10th Amendment.
No, they don't. Read the Constitution, the federal government has no powers or responsibilities except those specifically enumerated in the Constitution. Everything else is delegated to the states as each sees fit via the 10th Amendment.
Are you arguing that the fed doesn't give states money for programs in roads, education, medical care etc? I understand what the Constitution says. I'm talking about today's reality.
Are you arguing that the fed doesn't give states money for programs in roads, education, medical care etc? I understand what the Constitution says. I'm talking about today's reality.
I'm saying they have no Constitutional authority to tax, implement, administer, and/or distribute federal tax money for what Constitutionally should be states' programs. Not in the Constitution? The federal government can't do it.
I'm saying they have no Constitutional authority to tax, implement, administer, and/or distribute federal tax money for what Constitutionally should be states' programs. Not in the Constitution? The federal government can't do it.
But does the fed do it currently? The answer is yes.
No, I don't think you get what I'm laughing at. You're, as usual, attempting to talk out of both sides of your mouth. You're jumping from federal to state and back again and shoveling more and more BS as it becomes obvious that your argument is breaking down. Like all liberals, you're just talking in circles and hoping that people either lose interest in what you're saying or get fed up and leave. It's comical.
I just love the states rights argument. What should be the state programs which should not be funded with Federal tax dollars? Taxes such as tariffs have been around since the beginning of the country. The SCOTUS has shown that taxes are allowed to be tendered.
No, I don't think you get what I'm laughing at. You're, as usual, attempting to talk out of both sides of your mouth. You're jumping from federal to state and back again and shoveling more and more BS as it becomes obvious that your argument is breaking down. Like all liberals, you're just talking in circles and hoping that people either lose interest in what you're saying or get fed up and leave. It's comical.
Its comical that you can't rebut what I am saying using facts!
Those links posted were so chosen to show both sides of the issue at hand. That might be a foreign concept to you and if so, feel free to ignore it.
The amount of hate you harbor is disturbing. You follow me around this board, waiting to jump on every word I write. I suggest you find new meat.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm more upset about Bernie. Love that guy.
