Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:46 AM
 
46,217 posts, read 26,980,998 times
Reputation: 11091

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
They are going to release them on Trump's nominee's.
They are going to also release them on the dems that are up for reelection in 2 years....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,436,590 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog8food View Post
show me the "bit of research" that led you to a clear conclusion that "this news ain't fake."
Well..I'll let you do the research...assuming you have the inclination.

I believe the CIA and the other dozen Intelligence agencies are doing what they are paid to do.
The news that ain't fake..is that Trump has a real issue with the intelligence community...and as citizens, we should be concerned at the quality of information that decisions are being based on.

Just because CIA gets it wrong sometimes does not mean that they get it wrong all the time--but of course..decide for yourself.

BTW, I think that the WP is far more reputable and reliable than most internet blogs--not a fan of their editorial policy..but so??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:47 AM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,064,775 times
Reputation: 17204
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
They are going to also release them on the dems that are up for reelection in 2 years....
Be principled and not a dick and you have nothing to worry about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:49 AM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,075,409 times
Reputation: 6134
Look what we have here, evidence that the Washington Post is fake news, and making up stories about Russia interfering with the election.



Washington Post admits notorious article accusing websites of spreading fake Russian news may have been a bit fake




The Washington Post has appended its story accusing 'Russia of spreading fake news', saying it cannot vouch for the research of its independent 'experts.'

The article, - the newspaper's most read story the day it was published - was met with fierce backlash and even threats of legal action from some of the websites that felt they had been unfairly labelled.


It appears to try and distance the newspaper from its source. 'The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot's findings regarding any individual media outlet, nor did the article purport to do so,' the note stated.



Washington Post appends story accusing 'Russia of spreading fake news' | Daily Mail Online
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:50 AM
 
46,217 posts, read 26,980,998 times
Reputation: 11091
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Be principled and not a dick and you have nothing to worry about.
And that's why the dems lost....yet still put DWS back in power....

If it happens to the repubs...so be it...I have no compassion either way....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,711,133 times
Reputation: 6593
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Will you blame the Russians and call those that benefit communist sympathizers?
LOL, no! Just to clarify my position, if scandal manages to destroy both the Dems and the GOP, then I honestly believe that the USA will be a better place for it.

So just to be clear, will calling both of them a bunch of commie bastards hasten the destruction of both? If yes, then I'd seriously consider it. If/when we get there, I'll stand firmly behind the movement to expose both parties as being puppets of Marxism. That'd be fun!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:52 AM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,518,232 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
....read and decide...



Yes..I know it's the WP
I have to wonder why you still waste time with them since even you seem to know they are Fake News.

Trump addressed the CIA this morning on TV. He is not at war with them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:52 AM
 
8,307 posts, read 3,899,164 times
Reputation: 10631
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
ROTFLMAO!

Somehow I knew that someone would say that...of course...a bit of research would show you that, sadly, this news ain't fake.
Don't waste time butting heads with the whackjobs on this forum. There are a couple dozen of them that have zero interest in any sort of productive discussion. Just ignore them and move on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Surprise, AZ
8,580 posts, read 10,101,500 times
Reputation: 7927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
You are deflecting by bringing up an issue that is no longer relevant - what happened to Sanders at the hands of the DNC. It is certainly not relevant to this topic and thread.

Yes, I responded with the word "cute" because that is all I could muster for BS memes that provide no context to the issue at hand.

I, unlike you, do not believe the whole of the MSM, is out to get us. You feel differently? Fine by me.
Can you just stop digging yourself a hole? I fail to see how manipulation of the election in any form is not relevant to this topic and thread. Furthermore, if you need to see what deflection looks like, take a look at yourself, the DNC and MSM. In light of all of the factual material that was released about corruption within the DNC, why are you ignoring this information and instead choosing to focus on assumptions and conjecture?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:53 AM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,064,775 times
Reputation: 17204
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
LOL, no! Just to clarify my position, if scandal manages to destroy both the Dems and the GOP, then I honestly believe that the USA will be a better place for it.

So just to be clear, will calling both of them a bunch of commie bastards hasten the destruction of both? If yes, then I'd seriously consider it. If/when we get there, I'll stand firmly behind the movement to expose both parties as being puppets of Marxism. That'd be fun!
https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/c...bolton_who_is/

It couldn't happen to a better target. I have to sort of go back on what I said. Bolton's problem will be one of principle. A dyed in the wool war monger. The problem will be whether or not the unprincipled "left" will be able to get any traction what with being non existent the last eight years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top