Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:07 AM
 
Location: annandale, va & slidell, la
9,267 posts, read 5,112,755 times
Reputation: 8471

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The GOP doesn't need the (D)'s for anything. Reid has already opened the door to getting rid of the 60 vote threshold.
I thought Reid was seen jumping from the Vegas Stratosphere. Maybe not. One can only hope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:10 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,697,428 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
This is stupid and why things do NOT change. I've argued for years that you join with groups to accomplish a shared goal and then you can address your differences.

I supported BOTH the original Tea Party and OWS in their desires to stop the politicians from handing over billions to Wall Street.

If they had come together as opposed to allowing politicians (and those like yourself) to demonize one side or the other maybe we could have done it.
After the last eight years, there is no benefit to a bipartisan approach. To support Republicans now after Republicans opposed everything the last eight years would actually be destructive to the Democratic party. No one would say "Democrats are patriotic, look how they looked beyond the ugly partisanship of the past eight years to come together with Republicans." That would not happen! Democrats would be vilified and Republicans would crow that they were right. The only ones who would benefit from Democrats taking a bipartisan approach would be Republicans. The same Republicans that did not care about the country when they opposed anything and everything under a Democratic president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:14 AM
 
5,544 posts, read 8,308,222 times
Reputation: 11141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
A guide is being released and passed around that outlines how Democrats can continually oppose Trump over the next four years the same way Republicans opposed President Obama over eight years.

The guide argues that, like the “Tea Party patriots” who found common cause in their unified loathing of President Barack Obama, progressives who oppose Trump should stand against him before all else rather than try to articulate a policy agenda that has no hope of advancing while the GOP controls all three branches of government.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...on-indivisible

Can't argue with the logic of this. Republicans accomplished almost nothing during President Obama's terms other than attacking and for that they won it all. Crippling Trump and the GOP would be our patriotic duty.
Why do this? Is unsavory to me adding and childlike

If policy is to be opposed, ok. Oppose then take vote, try again on next policy disagreement

Last edited by theoldnorthstate; 12-15-2016 at 11:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:18 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,150,874 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
After the last eight years, there is no benefit to a bipartisan approach. To support Republicans now after Republicans opposed everything the last eight years would actually be destructive to the Democratic party.
I should have known better than expect you to address the actual argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:20 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,697,428 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoldnorthstate View Post
Why do this? Is unsavory to me

If policy is to be opposed, ok. Oppose then take vote, try again on next policy disagreement
Unsavory? You mean taking the same approach Republicans took? Republicans vowed to opposed every single thing under Obama on the night of his inauguration. For that, they won everything.

After three hours of strategizing, they decided they needed to fight Obama on everything. The new president had no idea what the Republicans were planning.

The Republicans' Plan for the New President | Inside Obama's Presidency | FRONTLINE | PBS

Democrats would not be rewarded for anything that was bipartisan. All benefits would go to Republicans. The only approach beneficial to Democrats is to make Republicans own everything, then exploit any negatives. That is the reality we have seen and considering Republicans control everything over the next four years, giving Republicans any cover whatsoever will not help Democrats in any way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:22 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,697,428 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I should have known better than expect you to address the actual argument.
The argument that if they had come together? Is that the argument? When did Republicans come together with Democrats on anything whatsoever? They even opposed health care for 9/11 responders! One has to give them credit for their consistency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:35 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,150,874 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
The argument that if they had come together? Is that the argument? When did Republicans come together with Democrats on anything whatsoever? They even opposed health care for 9/11 responders! One has to give them credit for their consistency.
That wasn't the argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,654,949 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
The argument that if they had come together? Is that the argument? When did Republicans come together with Democrats on anything whatsoever? They even opposed health care for 9/11 responders! One has to give them credit for their consistency.
The formula is very simple. Republicans decided when Obama won the first term that they would oppose him on every issue. The logic being that if Obama looks good, they look bad. So they did everything they could to hamstring the government from working. And they succeeded. the people became so disgusted at the failure of government to get anything done that they blamed the government in power when all along it was the obstructionist republicans who were actually pulling the strings.
Well the Republican strategy worked all too well.

Democrats would be amiss in their responsibility if they did anything less or more, in this case.

Don't give this administration water if it's dying of thirst, in the desert. Investigate everything. Demand accountability. Call out every lie, misrepresentation, distortion and false narrative.

Give them nothing and jail everyone of them you can get the goods on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:41 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,697,428 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
The formula is very simple. Republicans decided when Obama won the first term that they would oppose him on every issue. The logic being that if Obama looks good, they look bad. So they did everything they could to hamstring the government from working. And they succeeded. the people became so disgusted at the failure of government to get anything done that they blamed the government in power when all along it was the obstructionist republicans who were actually pulling the strings.
Well the Republican strategy worked all too well.

Democrats would be amiss in their responsibility if they did anything less or more, in this case.

Don't give this administration water if it's dying of thirst, in the desert. Investigate everything. Demand accountability. Call out every lie, misrepresentation, distortion and false narrative.

Give them nothing and jail everyone of them you can get the goods on.
x 1000! That really is the formula. There is no benefit in doing otherwise. Voters will not credit Democrats for any success so the only beneficial approach is opposition. Unfortunate that that is reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2016, 11:45 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,150,874 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
The formula is very simple. Republicans decided when Obama won the first term that they would oppose him on every issue. The logic being that if Obama looks good, they look bad. So they did everything they could to hamstring the government from working. And they succeeded. the people became so disgusted at the failure of government to get anything done that they blamed the government in power when all along it was the obstructionist republicans who were actually pulling the strings.
Well the Republican strategy worked all too well.

Democrats would be amiss in their responsibility if they did anything less or more, in this case.

Don't give this administration water if it's dying of thirst, in the desert. Investigate everything. Demand accountability. Call out every lie, misrepresentation, distortion and false narrative.

Give them nothing and jail everyone of them you can get the goods on.
The (D)'s lost the House when Pelosi said "we have to vote on it to see what is in it".

Now you can stake winning on the odds Trump will say something stupid and he is perfectly capable of doing that OR you have to actually present a position that the people will support.

One you can control, the other you cant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top