Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So it turns out that it was a Ex-British ambassador that personal got the emails from DNC whistleblowers, and turned them over to wikileaks.
A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whistleblowers - and not hacked by Russia.
Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
They will just ignore the facts. Kind of like when a terrorist states he is killing in the name of ISIS, the media and Obama ignore it and pretend to be searching for reasons why...
I'll wait for the Senate Foreign Relations Committees Investigation.
A confession from a known associate of Assange is far more evidence than has been presented by the US government that it was the Russians that hacked the DNC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
The article does not claim what you said. It says that this person received the information from the source, not that they were the source.
He was the source that gave it to Wikileaks.
I stated in the first sentence in the op that the ambassador got the emails from DNC whistleblowers.
This is an interesting 2004 article about Mr. Murray. I leave it to each reader to reach his or her own conclusions about this gentleman's credibility.
This is an interesting 2004 article about Mr. Murray. I leave it to each reader to reach his or her own conclusions about this gentleman's credibility.
This is an interesting 2004 article about Mr. Murray. I leave it to each reader to reach his or her own conclusions about this gentleman's credibility.
So it turns out that it was a Ex-British ambassador that personal got the emails from DNC whistleblowers, and turned them over to wikileaks.
'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
Under what circumstances does someone have "legal access" to the personal e-mail accounts of multiple staffmembers?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
