Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-06-2017, 09:25 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,924,139 times
Reputation: 3461

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
You mean you keep just beating the same old dead horse.

You do know that this was brought up 6-8 months ago by you dems?

Having construction loans on real estate is not a conflict of interest.

Where are the mods to lock this thread, it's all just bringing up issues that have already been beaten to death.
Beaten to death? He's not even President yet. Yeah I know, he won! Election is over.

Lock the thread? How about - don't read if you're not interested. Retreat to a safe space where you won't be triggered. Is it Post Traumatic Election Disorder?

Sheeesh, these Authoritarian Followers are something else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2017, 01:09 PM
 
59,040 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14281
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
What do you expect from a liberal paper?

"In 2012, as it had in 2008,[11] The Salt Lake Tribune endorsed Barack Obama for the presidency,"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Salt_Lake_Tribune
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,268 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15639
Why do they hate to be held to any ethics standards, instead of attacking the ethics office why not just comply?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 07:14 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,096,148 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Why do they hate to be held to any ethics standards, instead of attacking the ethics office why not just comply?

Come on dems, this isn't hard to understand.

Say it with me, the president, and vice president are exempt.

Trump is going above, and beyond what is required.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,924,139 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Why do they hate to be held to any ethics standards, instead of attacking the ethics office why not just comply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
Come on dems, this isn't hard to understand.

Say it with me, the president, and vice president are exempt.

Trump is going above, and beyond what is required.
The President & Vice President are exempt from any ethical standards?

President-elect Trump sure does seem to be going above & beyond in making that clear to the American people.

Are they also exempt from adhering to the Constitution? Specifically, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8? Is the President required to take an oath to preserve, protect & defend the Constitution of the United States?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 08:04 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,661,093 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
Come on dems, this isn't hard to understand.

Say it with me, the president, and vice president are exempt.

Trump is going above, and beyond what is required.

???What ?This can not be a serous post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 08:22 AM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,073,833 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1.. View Post
???What ?This can not be a serous post.
The sad part is, that poster is deadly serious. Ethics are things other people need to be held to, not the great Donald Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 08:23 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,661,093 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
The sad part is, that poster is deadly serious. Ethics are things other people need to be held to, not the great Donald Trump.

Yeah Trump has tainted the office of the President and he isn't even in it yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 08:30 AM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,096,148 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1.. View Post
???What ?This can not be a serous post.
The president, and vice president are exempt from conflicts of interest.

The ethics committee saying Trump has to do more to separate himself from his businesses is not true, he is exempt from conflicts of interest.

Congress made the president, and vice president exempt so they can always act in the best interest of the country, even if the president, or vice president may gain from some action.

If you don't like it, take it up with congress who made them exempt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 08:41 AM
 
18,323 posts, read 10,661,093 times
Reputation: 8602
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
The president, and vice president are exempt from conflicts of interest.
.
To a point.Now educate yourself.


Do Conflict-of-Interest Ethics Rules Apply to Trump? | Law News



The Trump Organization entered into a contract with the General Services Administration to lease the Old Post Office pavilion, a 117-year old property, in order to open the hotel. The Office of Government Ethics apparently determined ethics rules preventing other federal employees from making money from their positions do not apply to the President. Schooner disagrees.

“The contract specifically says that no elected official of the United States government can share or benefit from the lease. It’s a 60 year lease with the GSA but the language is unequivocally clear, ” Schooner said, “GSA should end the contract.”

More troubling, Schooner also points to the Constitution’s “Emoluments Clause,” which says that “no person holding any office of profit or trust under” the United States “shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.” He says this could eventually be grounds for an “impeachment issue” for Donald Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top