Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You read 31 pages and that's what you got out of it, what do you want to see all the code that was used to hack into the server.
Did you have the same concern for the hack into OPM and others, did you not trust our intelligence agencies for other other hacks or just this one. Congressional leaders had a detailed briefing, do you trust them.
You got your numbers backwards. It was a 13 page report, most of it being recommendations for preventing hacks, and only a vague explanation of how a "political party" was hacked. No evidence was presented in the report.
I stand by my original statement, if there was any credible evidence, they would present it to the UN Security Council, like you are supposed to do, rather than take unilateral action.
You got your numbers backwards, it was a 13 page report, most of it being recommendations for preventing hacks, and only a vague explanation of how a "political party" was hacked.
I stand by my original statement, if there was any credible evidence, they would present it to the UN Security Council, like you are supposed to do, rather than take unilateral action.
The writ was to indicate the actionstaken , the forensic evidence was not in those pages! The evidence now will be shared so the experts can break it down to the attometers. Just wait , many intelligent inquiring minds will discipher the evidence and you will get your fact check!
You read 31 pages and that's what you got out of it, what do you want to see all the code that was used to hack into the server.
Did you have the same concern for the hack into OPM and others, did you not trust our intelligence agencies for other other hacks or just this one. Congressional leaders had a detailed briefing, do you trust them.
Keep in mind these posters are the same people who support a man who said he thinks we reveal too much. Trump doesn't even think we should warn a city with civilians when we plan an attack. Frequently throughout his campaign, Trump said he wouldn't answer a question because he didn't want to reveal his plans!
I'm not a big fan of John McCain, but it's a little comforting to know that at least a few Republicans are willing to stand up and support the truth. One is a Senator who, according to Donald Trump, wasn't a war hero because he was caught (and spent 5-1/2 years in captivity) It makes you wonder who's the real patriot.
Cutting to the chase, we continue to see softeners that show they have no hard evidence:
"public attribution of these activities to RIS is supported by technical indicators from the U.S. Intelligence Community, DHS, FBI, the private sector, and other entities."
"Actors likely associated with RIS are continuing to engage in"
"Reported Russian Military and Civilian Intelligence Services (RIS)"
- Russia, may or may not have hacked the DNC, but there's just no hard proof. Certainly not enough proof to threaten military force against a nuclear super-power.
- The idea that they're the most sophisticated hackers on the planet, yet used a server that was easily traced back to Russia, used a Russian keyboard, left Russian alphabet charactors in the DNC server, worked only during Russian business hours & took Russian holidays off should all raise more eyebrows than act as proof.
- The corporate NeoLibs & NeoCons have been thirsting for a war with Russia now for a few years. From staging the coup d'etat in Ukraine to steal Russia's oil/gas business, to blaming Russia for shooting down the airliner in Ukraine, to us attacking Russia's ally Syria, to the bogus hacking claims, to the threats against Russia to the suspicious assassinations of Russian diplomats and a Russian military plane, now to the sanctions, it's all a big scam. They're conditioning the American public to support a war we have no business starting. "Russian Hacking" is the "Saddam has WMD's" of 2016.
- The reasons behind this horrible propaganda campaign are 1) to steal the pipeline in Syria & Russia's gas/oil business to Eastern Europe 2) prop up Saudi Arabia & ISIS throughout the Middle East & most importantly.....3) create a reason for a coup d'etat against Trump, either by claiming he's a Russian agent or by staging a false flag on US soil prior to the inauguration that will give the NeoLibs the reason they're looking for to refuse the passing of the presidency to the rightfully elected winner.
Keep in mind these posters are the same people who support a man who said he thinks we reveal too much. Trump doesn't even think we should warn a city with civilians when we plan an attack. Frequently throughout his campaign, Trump said he wouldn't answer a question because he didn't want to reveal his plans!
I'm not a big fan of John McCain, but it's a little comforting to know that at least a few Republicans are willing to stand up and support the truth. One is a Senator who, according to Donald Trump, wasn't a war hero because he was caught (and spent 5-1/2 years in captivity) It makes you wonder who's the real patriot.
Once you started aligning yourself with the NeoCons you officially crossed over to the dark side. The fact that Bush, McCain and the other assorted NeoCon trash about to be tossed out of Washington, all endorsed Hillary Clinton should tell you everything you need to know about what you've come to support.
Just was declassified, so now the techs can inspect - what are you afraid of?
Not everything was declassified, but the fact that so many federal and private agencies all confirm that Russia was behind the hacking to influence our elections should be enough, that is, unless someone's tin hat is screwed on too tight.
You would think that if there was any credible evidence, they would present it to the UN Security Council, like you are supposed to do, rather than take unilateral action.
At least, Colin Powell could shake a vial with his sperm again. It worked once as a good evidence...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump doesn't even think we should warn a city with civilians when we plan an attack. Frequently throughout his campaign, Trump said he wouldn't answer a question because he didn't want to reveal his plans! 
