Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:40 AM
 
17,390 posts, read 11,927,067 times
Reputation: 16136

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bohemka View Post
What about this is ownership? It's about curtailing the spread of disease and keeping the general health of the population secure. The plague did not discriminate based on how hard someone worked and what was fair and what wasn't.


What?
If it were ONLY about curtailing diseases, there could be some argument to be made that it is the fed's responsibility. But how is anything other than preventing diseases that could affect the general population for the greater good of society?

You want to abuse your OWN body for your entire life, don't expect me to pick up the tab when you fall apart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:40 AM
 
8,588 posts, read 9,085,532 times
Reputation: 5924
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
America is not leery of Medicare at all, which is a government single payer system. America loves it. GOP hates it, but that shouldnt prevent us from expanding it into a Medicare-for-all system.
Expand medicare on the sliding scale. Lower the age requirment to 55, removing higher risk from the pool. Lower the age overtime allowing state regulated for-profits to offer supplemental coverage. Negotiate pharmaceuticals costs.

Problem solved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:43 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,702,191 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
America is not leery of Medicare at all, which is a government single payer system. America loves it. GOP hates it, but that shouldnt prevent us from expanding it into a Medicare-for-all system.
Medicare allows people to blow their life savings on vacations and junk and then sticking the cost of caring for them for 30 years to other taxpayers.

Recipients will use up every penny they contributed to the plan over their lifetime with one visit to a doctor.

It is the equivalent of buying a life insurance policy six months before you die. One premium payment and a windfall to your beneficiary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:45 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,013,817 times
Reputation: 17189
I skipped a bunch of pages but..........many who are against the idea of Universal Health care also support our current path of going after businesses that send jobs elsewhere. It would be far easier for companies to compete if they were not the ones largely responsible for providing health care insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:45 AM
 
3,458 posts, read 1,445,847 times
Reputation: 1755
Quote:
Originally Posted by man4857 View Post
That plus in general the population is pretty poorly educated and doesn't have the basic critical skills necessary to see why this is the way to go amongst other issues. They vote for principle rather than policy. We're a society of blaming others for our problems but never taking the blame ourselves.
I don't really agree. I think there are several ways people attempt having a good healthcare system. In all honesty they all have their good and bad side effects. Obamacare was first praised and then after time and reality set in most people realized it wasn't a working system. We will try Trump and see if that works, if not then people might be more receptive to a single payer system. It would be a cheaper option for each individual and account for those who don't pay into the system but I think people just fear lack of good coverage. I don't agree that they are poorly educated or name callers. It's hard to know how a system will work in our country without trying it, even for the highly educated. Lots of dynamics at play there.

The single payer isn't without fault in other countries either. It's just available to everyone.

Last edited by Tokinouta; 01-05-2017 at 10:55 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:52 AM
 
34,620 posts, read 21,517,293 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanny Goat View Post
The doctor has his/her own fees, which are high. You can see that hospital charge separately on your bill. Your insurance contracts it down, but it's still high. They usually charge $100??/5 minutes (visit) when you're in the hospital, to walk in and say "How are you," and say a few things and leave. Maybe it's more. That's what they do, too.

Many charges in a hospital are price gouged. That's why people go to Mexico or Brazil or C. America for their operations I suppose--if they can. It's a monopoly. Don't see what people can do if they have to go to a hospital, but pay the market price for the service. Or, die, which probably will happen to many people in the future if they can't pay. Or, the ones who can pay will pay and have higher premiums.
Median income of a general practitioner (family doctor) in the US is $138,000.

Physician / Doctor, General Practice Salary

The median income of an oncologist in the US is $282,000.

Physician - Hematology/Oncology Salaries by education, experience, location and more - Salary.com

They are not getting super rich nor are they paid too much.

Stop with the envy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:53 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,919,102 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokinouta View Post

If there were enough who wanted what you do Bernie Sanders would have won.
The majority of the American people support a Medicare-for-all single payer system.

Majority in U.S. Support Idea of Fed-Funded Healthcare System | Gallup
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:54 AM
 
3,458 posts, read 1,445,847 times
Reputation: 1755
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
Expand medicare on the sliding scale. Lower the age requirment to 55, removing higher risk from the pool. Lower the age overtime allowing state regulated for-profits to offer supplemental coverage. Negotiate pharmaceuticals costs.

Problem solved.
Actually, not a bad idea. People could afford a rise early on, and benefit from medicare earlier when health normally declines. Sounds pretty good.

average wage — $44,600 per spouse at 65 in 2010 paid $722,000 into Social Security and Medicare They'll take out an average of $966,000 in benefits. So about 1/3 the benefits vs what they paid in taxes. Now, that money sitting in an interest account would make more.

So, let's collect a mil, and lower the age to 50.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Chicago
6,160 posts, read 5,668,849 times
Reputation: 6193
An easy solution to this would be:

1) Everyone joins the Medicare/Medicaid system and health insurance companies are almost completely eliminated.
2) Raise the medicare/medicaid tax to help fund the massive increase of people in the system. Remember that you and your employer no longer has to pay for health insurance.
3) Now that the medicare/medicaid system has control, they also have the ability to tell hospitals and pharmaceutical companies "sorry, that $8000 MRI you billed should cost no more than $500. Here's a check for $500" and "sorry, that $50 bandaid costs $1 at CVS, here's $5 to cover the cost of the bandaid plus applying it to the patient".

But because of lobbyists in the insurance, medical, and pharmaceutical industries, this will almost never happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2017, 10:58 AM
 
3,458 posts, read 1,445,847 times
Reputation: 1755
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
The majority of the American people support a Medicare-for-all single payer system.

Majority in U.S. Support Idea of Fed-Funded Healthcare System | Gallup
Since Trump seems to listen to the public over constituents then maybe that will be the new proposal. I'm excited to see what transpires. He definitely leans toward a populist president. Hopefully he'll tweet about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top