Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't know if LawNewz has a political perspective, but this is their reaction:
"Our lawyers at LawNewz.com reviewed the 25 page document, and we’ve compiled the five biggest ‘bombshells.’ Overall, the report is vague on details, and evidence backing up the allegations."
I find LawNewz tends to be conservative, but you left out even their context by omitting the rest of the sentence:
"The report has been declassified, so of course, it is possible that the fully classified version has more empirical evidence."
Personally, I wonder how point #2 might apply to C-D:
# 2 Russia paid “internet trolls.” From the report: “Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”
# 2 Russia paid “internet trolls.” From the report: “Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”
Over the past few weeks, it's been fairly obviously that we have one or two of them here (or just wannabes maybe).
I find LawNewz tends to be conservative, but you left out even their context by omitting the rest of the sentence:
"The report has been declassified, so of course, it is possible that the fully classified version has more empirical evidence."
Personally, I wonder how point #2 might apply to C-D:
# 2 Russia paid “internet trolls.” From the report: “Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”
I found this interesting.
"When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign then focused on
undermining her expected presidency."
So, they tried to hurt Clinton and admitted that they failed and that she WOULD WIN ANYWAY.
"When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign then focused on
undermining her expected presidency."
So, they tried to hurt Clinton and admitted that they failed and that she WOULD WIN ANYWAY.
What's your point? That the Russian pollsters were as wrong as our own? Maybe Comey acted on his own?
I think the people at fivethirtyeight are pretty sharp. They were the closest to calling it for trump. They think the Comey hairball cough-up cost Clinton the election:
So Trump wants our Intelligence agencies to investigate why news media saw the report before he did. Since he doesn't believe our Intelligence agencies, why bother with the report? Does Trump believe the report now that it's out?
"Wonderful." President-elect-sociopath is going to give us (OK, spend our money on) four years of witch hunts. Nice job voting 'merica
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove
So Trump wants our Intelligence agencies to investigate why news media saw the report before he did. Since he doesn't believe our Intelligence agencies, why bother with the report? Does Trump believe the report now that it's out?
"Wonderful." President-elect-sociopath is going to give us (OK, spend our money on) four years of witch hunts. Nice job voting 'merica
But will he believe those reports? That's the problem. If he doesn't believe U.S. Intelligence reports, why ask them to do more reports? Won't they all be bad?
Hillary Clinton didn't lose the election because of the Russians.
Hillary Clinton lost the election because well...... she's Hillary Clinton.
Case closed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
