Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If a person residing in the USA, does not respect or follow the US Constitution word for word,(not what they think it should say) they are in fact a Domestic Enemy. This goes for Supreme Court Justices too.
The people composing the US Constitutions and all the amendments, were not running out of ink to be as specific as they wanted to be. The reason the Constitution is as originally composed, is because everything left specifically out, is for the liberty of each individual person to decide for themselves.
Our laws have put words between the original words in the Bill of Rights, completely changing the Bill of Rights and politically appointed Supreme Court Justices have agreed the Federal Government can, without amendment.
To this, I wish to amend the US Constitution to be: The Supreme Court will be the ultimate Jury. Any doubt on the Constitutionality from one Judge, reserves the liberty to the people and the action deemed unconstitutional...
Based on your response, you won't care, but I'll say it again: the first amendment disagrees.
If you think the founding fathers didn't want people who disagreed to have a voice, you must assume they were not good people. They wanted a political society, a liberal republic to be exact. Demanding everyone agree with the laws does not constitute as such.
If it's not clear; you're argument is **** and your understanding of the constitution has the naivety of a child.
Based on your response, you won't care, but I'll say it again: the first amendment disagrees.
If you think the founding fathers didn't want people who disagreed to have a voice, you must assume they were not good people. They wanted a political society, a liberal republic to be exact. Demanding everyone agree with the laws does not constitute as such.
If it's not clear; you're argument is **** and your understanding of the constitution has the naivety of a child.
Forcing an alteration of the Constitution, without amending it. The constitution today, has way more words than it did the day it was ratified. All added by laws.
The very amendment you reference, has been altered and words added by laws, without amendment for the words used.....
Irrelevant. The changes do not reflect the views of the founding fathers and your original argument clearly indicated that their intent was what we are to follow, while ironically, you violate their views by saying any who disagree should be viewed as an enemy of the state.
Forcing an alteration of the Constitution, without amending it. The constitution today, has way more words than it did the day it was ratified. All added by laws.
Such as? If you're referring to Supreme Court rulings, that is sort of their duty. They determine what does and does not violate the constitution. Should they make a decision you disagree with, take action if you wish. This does not make them enemies of the state.
Should the President offer up an executive order you feel is unconstitutional, take action. Executive orders can be overturned. Should congress pass laws you feel are unconstitutional, voice your concern, and perhaps the president or SCOTUS will listen.
But someone who disagrees with the constitution cannot be labeled an enemy of the state, rather or not it makes sense for them to disagree with it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
