Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-30-2017, 12:15 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,483,414 times
Reputation: 12187

Advertisements

The percent of the USA that is "White Non Hispanic only" is in decline which looks like bad news for the GOP. But within the numbers of the White decline it is likely that White Republicans have a stable population while non religions Whites - a core Democrat group - have very low fertility rates and will soon have a rapid population decline.


This explains why the GOP has so far done great while the White alone population went from 90% to 66%. White likely GOP voters have maintained a stable fertility rate, enough to offset any growth among non Whites who are most likely to vote Democrat. This also means that the future of the Democrat party will be less based on White Liberal issues - mainly social issues like gay marriage - and more based on economic issues that more socially conservative non White Democrats care about like minimum wage.


The prevailing narrative of the media has been the nuclear family is in decline and the future is secular and non traditional. No more single family homes in the suburbs but only urban style apartments in the central city. But once today's crop of secular people with no children dies off all that is left are the children of religious people.



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2017, 12:22 PM
 
4,081 posts, read 3,606,367 times
Reputation: 1235
That makes sense.

I've heard of white Liberals proclaiming such ridiculous things as "I won't have kids because they're white" or "They will be born into an unjust society". It doesn't really help their cause long-term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 01:03 PM
 
26 posts, read 14,472 times
Reputation: 42
This is interesting. I have read that Republican woman are more likely to marry earlier and have more children than their democrat counterparts. However there is no guarantee that child would grow up to vote republican just beacuase both their parents are republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 01:09 PM
 
4,540 posts, read 2,786,962 times
Reputation: 4921
We need a one child policy in Utah lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 01:17 PM
 
4,660 posts, read 4,122,865 times
Reputation: 9012
The Democrats have the real Demorgaphic problem, not only for the reasons that you have mentioned, but also because Asians and Hispanics who marry whites (and they do at massive levels) vote Republican and have kids who consider themselves white or partially white.

That is why Trump got more Asians and Hispanics than McCain or Romney, even as he lost a little of the white vote. Minorities are slowly but steadily being "whitened out."

Also, with Hispanic immigration in decline due to changing demographics and Trump furthering the process with border control, there are going to be fewer and fewer of them to whiten.

Last edited by cachibatches; 01-30-2017 at 01:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 01:19 PM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,081 posts, read 31,322,562 times
Reputation: 47561
The Democrats have become a party of mostly urban, coastal self-hating whites. minorities, and belligerent agitators of all stripes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 01:21 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,399,266 times
Reputation: 4812
The racial alignments within parties are only going to become more absolute with time. In a relatively short time period, it's going to essentially be Whites vs non-Whites.

Thanks 1965 Immigration Act. Apparently all of the placating put forth in regard to its consequences, at the time, was a complete lie.

Maybe we should look into how, why, and who brought it about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 01:27 PM
 
3,615 posts, read 2,331,782 times
Reputation: 2239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious Conversation View Post
The Democrats have become a party of mostly urban, coastal self-hating whites. minorities, and belligerent agitators of all stripes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
The racial alignments within parties are only going to become more absolute with time. In a relatively short time period, it's going to essentially be Whites vs non-Whites.

Thanks 1965 Immigration Act. Apparently all of the placating put forth in regard to its consequences, at the time, was a complete lie.

Maybe we should look into how, why, and who brought it about.
I think one of the reasons the media focused on the supposed trump rural blue collar vote was to divert attention on how the majority of whites voted for trump all across the spectrum, trump even won white millenials.

Trump beat Clinton among white women 53 percent to 43 percent. Clinton lost to Trump among white men by 63 percent to 31 percent.

Thats a pretty enormous racial divide considering how poor trump did among Blacks, Hispanics and Asians

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news...us-presidency/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2017, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,610,214 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridanative10 View Post
I think one of the reasons the media focused on the supposed trump rural blue collar vote was to divert attention on how the majority of whites voted for trump all across the spectrum, trump even won white millenials.


Trump beat Clinton among white women 53 percent to 43 percent. Clinton lost to Trump among white men by 63 percent to 31 percent.

Thats a pretty enormous racial divide
I'm white and I didn't vote for Drumpf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top