Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What do you think? I feel like with her she would have kept all of Obama's policies and wouldn't have brought any real change. Nothing would be done over illegal immigration and more refugees from Syria would have continued to pour in. Snowflakes would have accused anybody who disagrees were her as "sexist."
Not to mention we would have had the most annoying VP in recent history.
Yes. And that's a big reason why she was even more unacceptable than she would've otherwise been (2008 Hillary I could have at least somewhat stomached). She pandered to the far left this time as that's what Obama did and she was trying to capture his coalition.
of course. This is precisely the reason she was not elected (additionally to the fact that she is a lot less likeable than Obama). People don't want Obama's third mandate.
How long are you people going to drag Hillary Clinton through the mud? The election is over, as you so often love to remind everyone--and yet you just can't let Clinton go. Is it because there's a lull in the hate-fest? Nobody immediately available to hate on, so drag Clinton out for one more round? Shameful.
How long are you people going to drag Hillary Clinton through the mud? The election is over, as you so often love to remind everyone--and yet you just can't let Clinton go. Is it because there's a lull in the hate-fest? Nobody immediately available to hate on, so drag Clinton out for one more round? Shameful.
For at least as long as liberals keep dragging Trump through the mud. Does that answer your question?
What do you think? I feel like with her she would have kept all of Obama's policies and wouldn't have brought any real change. Nothing would be done over illegal immigration and more refugees from Syria would have continued to pour in. Snowflakes would have accused anybody who disagrees were her as "sexist."
Not to mention we would have had the most annoying VP in recent history.
Trump hijacked thr Republican party. He has nothing to do with main line Republicans. Obama is a Reagan democrate and the last of the Ronald Reagan era presidents. If Hillary would have won, it would have been 40 years of neoliberal policies which started under Ronald Reagan. 40 years, that's 2 generations of uneducated whites, dependent on the government blacks and so on being ruined by thier own government. While only a small faction of the American populace mainly the intelligentsia based in NYC, DC, sf Boston reap rewards. Hillary defeat marks the end of neoliberalism and the end of the continuation of Reaganism. Men like Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton Bushes and Obama are the reason why Donald Trump got elected and responsible. The trumpettes had to fight the Republican establishment and won and fight the Democrat establishment for the presidency.
Last edited by CaseyB; 01-28-2017 at 02:12 PM..
Reason: rude
What do you think? I feel like with her she would have kept all of Obama's policies and wouldn't have brought any real change. Nothing would be done over illegal immigration and more refugees from Syria would have continued to pour in. Snowflakes would have accused anybody who disagrees were her as "sexist."
Not to mention we would have had the most annoying VP in recent history.
This is a mute point at this time. But I don't think so because she would had by her side the former president Bill Clinton and he would be influence some of her policies. This besides the fact that she is/was her own person and would have wanted to make her own mark on the job.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.