Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Republicans refused to vote on Obama's Supreme Court nominee. This violates the U.S. constitution.
Why are Republicans ok with this? Yet they are obsessed with the Second Amendment which isn't even part of the original constitution?
Two things...
1) This is not a violation of the Constitution, and anyone who says otherwise is a moron.
2) No one actually cares about the Constitution. They may pay it lip-service when it serves their purposes, but the moment it prevents them from getting what they want, it becomes toilet paper.
If the Congress refuses to vote on a nominee, it is functionally the same as Congress voting "No" on that nominee. The only difference is a matter of perception, not function.
Theoretically, Congress could say "No" to every single nominee Trump nominee as well, for the next four or eight years. So what?
The Republicans refused to vote on Obama's Supreme Court nominee. This violates the U.S. constitution.
No it doesn't but I suspect you know this but for some reason you felt we needed another stupid repetitive thread.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
