U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:06 PM
 
772 posts, read 378,593 times
Reputation: 430

Advertisements

I think it's a wise move on behalf of our President, until he can get rid of the remaining covert Obama worshippers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:10 PM
 
20,375 posts, read 18,882,251 times
Reputation: 8028
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
yes god forbid we talk about clean air and water

so on one side we have the oil industry, steel industry, mining industry, logging industry , coal industry, chemical industry, paper industry, etc, etc., making tons of profits and pouring that money into lobbying, so they can dump hazardous chemicals into streams and rivers, or emit them into the air. In your world those are the "good guys."

and on the other side we have an underfunded federal agency that sets rules that protect the general public. In your world those are the "bad guys"

Makes sense.

So you think the EPA was being objective until now? If Trump can dismantle it so quickly, it just proves once again that these agencies serve their masters. And again how does exporting pollution to China help from the global perspective?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:12 PM
 
52,423 posts, read 25,776,722 times
Reputation: 21085
Looks like more Fake News.

White House says it hasn't told agencies to stop tweeting | TheHill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:17 PM
 
22,769 posts, read 30,223,303 times
Reputation: 14717
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
So you think the EPA was being objective until now?
who said 'objective' ? i said 'effective'

Quote:
If Trump can dismantle it so quickly, it just proves once again that these agencies serve their masters.
i have no idea what this is supposed to mean. On the surface it sounds really, really stupid, like you don't even know the basics of American government. i'm pretty sure you aren't stupid so I'm going to leave it to you to develop this point.

Quote:
And again how does exporting pollution to China help from the global perspective?
It doesn't. The EPA isn't the reason we trade with China. the EPA isn't the reason we can't get China to sign a global warming treaty.

Regardless not all pollution is global in impact. Some of this stuff the EPA regulates is local/regional air, soil, and water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:20 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,228 posts, read 25,951,970 times
Reputation: 11081
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Looks like the backlash is making them back pedal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:23 PM
 
22,769 posts, read 30,223,303 times
Reputation: 14717
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post

https://www.apnews.com/55d484c19c284...&utm_medium=AP
12:45 p.m.

"The Trump administration has instituted a media blackout at the Environmental Protection Agency and barred staff from awarding any new contracts or grants.

Emails sent to EPA staff since President Donald Trump's inauguration on Friday and reviewed by The Associated Press detailed the specific prohibitions banning press releases, blog updates or posts to the agency's social media accounts."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:25 PM
 
Location: NC
11,096 posts, read 7,991,654 times
Reputation: 12198
Quote:
Originally Posted by fordtrucks View Post
That someone is finally reining in this out of control power hungry enviro fanatical bureaucracy!

Trump admin institutes media blackout for EPA, suspends social media activity | Fox News
Whatever happened to "The Government works for, and answers to the people"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:25 PM
 
22,769 posts, read 30,223,303 times
Reputation: 14717
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Looks like the backlash is making them back pedal.
No, they are just playing word games.

All they said was that the White House hasn't given blanket instructions to all departments.

They didn't say whether the EPA specifically was given instructions.

They didn't say whether Trump's appointees were giving instructions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:29 PM
 
3,368 posts, read 1,536,572 times
Reputation: 1647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Correct, I do not understand the question.

Who checks their work? Who has the expertise to define what is safe and unsafe practices? And who follows up when they fall down on the job, as invariably happens in a non-trivial number of cases?

The miners have every incentive not to do anything. State governments are quite easy to buy, we both know that. 1300+ Superfund sites providees ample evidence.
Exactly, if we decide the EPA is a necessity, then we cannot put the blamw soley on the state and miners.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
They do not possess the knowledge for prevention efforts. Sure, they can litigate after the damage is done, for what good that does anyone.

Not that the EPA has a 100% success rate, but they're a damn sight better than nothing.
Yes, if we agree that a government over site agency is necessary for this, then we must be able to hold them accountable.

I believe we are on the same page.
My argument is that the EPA is not a charity organization doing altruistic favors. They are a governmental agency at the federal level entrusted and assigned to do a job.

They don't get a pass on that job when it is done incorrectly or even poorly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2017, 03:33 PM
 
3,368 posts, read 1,536,572 times
Reputation: 1647
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Because mining companies don't care. They are totally irresponsible.

And states will compete to see who can have the worst possible environmental regs. They can't be trusted like the feds. They also can't be trusted to manage the air and water pollutants that cross state lines.

State-level environmental regulation has been a total failure, which is why we have the EPA to begin with. The EPA, by contrast, has been extremely successful.
I was not suggesting it. It was a devil's advocate position.

Although I will admit, I winced when I read that you considered the feds trustworthy, lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top