Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Eisenhower accomplished it along the same lines. Make these criminals so uncomfortable they just self deport.
The case of California is a good example--said 540,000 people were to be deported from California alone during the campaign, said professor at Syracuse University. But at least 485,000 would have had to deport themselves, and there’s no evidence that they actually returned to Mexico in those numbers.
Kelly Lytle Hernandez, professor at the University of California Los Angeles, puts the maximum number of people actually deported during the operation at 250,000. The vast majority of the program took place during fiscal year 1955, which registered just about 254,000 apprehensions total, she wrote in a 2010 report.Trump: Eisenhower deported 1.5 million immigrants | PolitiFact
A local cop pulls a guy over who is wanted by the Feds. Locals notifies the agency that wants the guy. A detainer is issued by the Feds. Suddenly the Feds assume the burden of the cost of the individual. The cop was doing his job that he was paid to do initially.
Where is the cost of all that a burden to the city?
that has always BEEN DONE__ what they talking about is helping feds look for them - even if not committed any other crime besides entering the county or an overstay. that is what the cities say will NOT do.
in the United States and Canada, a sanctuary city is a city that has adopted a policy of protecting illegal immigrants by not prosecuting them for violating federal immigration laws The term applies generally to cities that do not use municipal funds or resources to enforce national immigration laws, and usually forbid police or municipal employees to inquire about a person's immigration status.
that has always BEEN DONE__ what they talking about is helping feds look for them - even if not committed any other crime besides entering the county or an overstay. that is what the cities say will NOT do.
in the United States and Canada, a sanctuary city is a city that has adopted a policy of protecting illegal immigrants by not prosecuting them for violating federal immigration laws The term applies generally to cities that do not use municipal funds or resources to enforce national immigration laws, and usually forbid police or municipal employees to inquire about a person's immigration status.
When the Feds are looking for someone, they put the word so IF a local cop catches him turns him over to the Feds. No cost incurred.
If the Feds are conducting a raid they inform the locals as a courtesy but if the locals want to involve themselves in the raid that's on them.
I think that is what your side is saying? Trump is saying that the Police need to help ICE. Being in the Police Department is a job where you get paid. Taxpayers pay for them. We don't pay them to help Federal agencies fulfill their jobs.
You do realize that the Federal Government does repatriate tax funds they receive to the STATES? Here's a link that explains just how it actually how Fed Funds FLOW right back to the STATES ..which do fund such things as their Police to assist !!!!
The states that receive the most money from the federal government each year are, generally, the most populous ones. In 2010, eight of the 10 states with the highest population received the most. California, the most populous state in the country, receives the largest share — more than a third of a trillion dollars. However, when accounting for population and the amount states pay in federal taxes, the breakdown looks very different.
Quote:
Some states, including Alaska and Virginia, received more than $15,000 per person from the federal government, even after subtracting the billions the state spent on income tax. This figure is nearly two-and-a-half times the amount received per person after taxes in states like Nevada, one of the poorest states in the country.
Quote:
It would be expected that states that receive more money from the federal government are in greater need. However, most of the 10 states with the highest federal spending per capita had a higher median household income than the United States average. In fact, the first-, third-, fourth- and fifth-wealthiest by this measure all received the most money from the government. Because of their wealth, these states spent the most per capita in income tax, but it is negligible compared to the vast amounts they received.
SO hey, Just how much does your particular STATE pay to FEDS..Compared to WHAT they receive from the Feds?
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,432,065 times
Reputation: 12187
I don't think you will have police forced to do check points in immigrant areas searching just for people here illegally. That doesn't even make sense when many cities have high rates of homicides and shootings. But what happens to someone who commits a violent crime and is found to be here illegally? Should tax payers pay to put them in our jails or deport them and have their home country pay the bill?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
skin color ? language? big beard? hat? 
a machetazo is what they would find-- scary stuff you talking 
